crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

IJ: Texas assault involving family violence is not crime of violence aggravated felony

An Immigration Judgein Texas last week found that a Texas conviction for assaultinvolving family violence, Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a),does not fall into the crime of violence category of aggravatedfelony. This was a great victory for one of our clients that we wonbased primarily on the brief we submitted.

Section 101(a)(43)(F)defines a crime of violence in relation to 18 U.S.C. § 16.In turn, 18 U.S.C. § 16 defines a crime of violence as

(a) an offense thathas as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use ofphysical force against the person or property of another, or (b) anyother offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves asubstantial risk that physical force against the person or propertyof another may be used in the course of committing the offense.

Thereis no doubt that Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a) does not meet thedefinition of subpart (a). In United States v. Villegas-Hernandez the Fifth Circuit held that “use of force is not an element ofassault under section 22.01(a)(1), and [thus] the assault offensedoes not fit subsection 16(a)’s definition for crime of violence.”468 F.3d 874, 879 (5th Cir. 2006).

The difficult issue was whether § 22.01(a) constitutes a crime ofviolence as defined in subpart (b) of 18 U.S.C. 16. We argued that §22.01(a) does not satisfy this subpart because it does not by itsnature, involve a substantial risk that physical force against theperson or property of another may be used in the course of committingthe offense. We argued as follows: “A ‘substantial risk requires a strong probability that the applicationof physical force during the commission of the crime will occur.’”United States v. Landeros-Gonzales,262 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2001) (quoting United States v. Rodriguez-Guzman,56 F.3d 18, 20 (5th Cir. 1995)). “'[F]orce,’ as used in thestatutory definition of ‘crime of violence,’ is ‘synonymous withdestructive or violent force.’” Landeros-Gonzales, 262 F.3d at 426 (quoting Rodriguez-Guzman, 56 F.3d at 20 n.8). In addition, “[w]hen the aggravated felonyprovision uses ‘involves’ language, we inquire whether violation ofthe statute necessarily entails the ‘involved’ behavior.” Omari v. Gonzales,419 F.3d 303, 307 (5th Cir. 2005). Meanwhile, “[t]he bodily injuryrequired by section 22.01(a)(1) is ‘physical pain, illness, or anyimpairment of physical condition.’” Villegas-Hernandez, 468 F.3d at 879.

Ineffect, our argument boiled down to this: that physical pain,illness, or impairment—the level of bodily injured required for aconviction under Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)—is not equivalent tothe destructive or violent force required by the crime of violencedefinition.

Importantly, we werealso able to convince the IJ that DHS was incorrect in attempting touse the criminal court’s family violence finding to bolster its crimeof violence argument. DHS essentially wanted the IJ to find thatassault involving family violence is more violent—and thus moreclearly a COV—than assault without a family violence finding. TheTexas assault statute provides for an increased sentence if thecriminal court finds that the victim was a member of a protectedclass that includes certain family members of the defendant. Wesuccessfully argued that such a finding is a sentencing enhancement;it is not an element of the crime. As such, under the categoricalapproach or the modified categorical approach, a sentencingenhancement is an inappropriate consideration.

If the argumentworks with one IJ hopefully it will work with others! I’m happy toprovide more specifics on our argument if it would be of help to you.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on August 18, 2009 on 1:28 pm 9 Comments
Filed Under: Immigration Court

Comments

  1. kttjkoom says

    October 26, 2009 at 10:30 am

    wrqcsfle hpxxznrk http://tfiqzoel.com fkilnyce zucfapne [URL=http://lnpavira.com]rkwdbswb[/URL]

    Reply
  2. Tacfit Commando says

    August 26, 2010 at 7:47 am

    I like your style, the fact that your site is a little bit different makes it so interesting, I get fed up of seeing same-old-same-old all of the time. I’ve just stumbled this page for you 😀

    Reply
  3. Fat Loss 4 Idiots says

    September 2, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    This is my first time at your blog and I’ve really enjoyed looking around. I will come back again in the future to check out some of the other articles.

    Reply
  4. computer repair bronxville says

    September 29, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    I am going to recommend this blog to my friends

    Reply
  5. Lola says

    May 3, 2012 at 8:21 am

    Great job! You mentioned the family violence finding and I was wondering if this involved Tex. Penal Code section 22.01(b)(2)(A) or 22.01(b)(2)(B).

    Reply
  6. Cesar says

    May 3, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    Lola,

    It’s been several years since working on this case, so unfortunately I can’t remember.

    César

    Reply
  7. cheap loans no credit check says

    April 24, 2013 at 4:09 am

    cheap loans no credit check

    crImmigration.com: IJ: Texas assault involving family violence is not crime of violence aggravated felony

    Reply
  8. latest score chelsea v man utd says

    April 24, 2013 at 9:57 am

    latest score chelsea v man utd

    crImmigration.com: IJ: Texas assault involving family violence is not crime of violence aggravated felony

    Reply
  9. Karen says

    March 20, 2014 at 9:56 pm

    I am writing an appellate brief on this EXACT issue right now due April 3rd, 2014. Could you provide me the specifics that you mentioned you have on this. My client’s assault FM was enhanced statutorily b/c of previous conviction of Assault FM (not b/c of aggravating factors existing on the record) and Judge found it was a COV and agg fel for honestly unconvincing reasons. Please respond. Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court says gap in conviction records hurts migrant
  • Abolish ICE
  • Federal court enjoins 100-day deportation pause
  • ICE issues enforcement priorities
  • Immigration possibilities & challenges
  • Criminal bars, policing changes, & meaningful reforms in proposed legislation

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.