crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

Archive

After regularly updating crimmigration.com from January 2009 until November 2022, I have stopped doing so. I hope you continue to benefit from the blog as an archive. For up-to-date information about my work, visit ccgarciahernandez.com. – César

9th Circuit: California unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor is not sexual abuse of a minor aggravated felony

In a published decision released this week, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that California’s unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor offense, Cal. Penal Code § 261.5(d), does not constitute sexual abuse of a minor. Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 600-02 (1990), and Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 20-21 (2005). Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16446. “Under the categorical approach, we ‘compare the elements of the statute of conviction with a federal definition of the crime to determine whether conduct proscribed by the statute is broader than the generic federal definition.’” Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16446 (quoting Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008)). The Ninth Circuit then set out two definitions of sexual abuse of a minor under INA § 101(a)(43)(A).

The Court’s first definition, announced in Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey, 546 F.3d 1147, 1152 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), identified four elements of sexual abuse of a minor: “(1) a mens rea of ‘knowingly’ (as to engaging in the act); (2) a sexual act (3) with a minor who is at least 12 but not yet 16 years of age; and (4) an age difference of at least four years between the defendant and the minor.” Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16448.

A later case, United States v. Medina-Villa, 567 F.3d 507, 514 (9th Cir. 2009), narrowed Estrada-Espinoza to statutory rape crimes only. Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16448. Medina-Villa identified three elements required for the generic offense of sexual abuse of a minor in all circumstances not involving statutory rape: “(1) the conduct prohibited by the statute is sexual, (2) the statute protects a minor, and (3) the statute requires abuse.” Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16449. According to the Ninth Circuit, “A criminal statute includes the element of ‘abuse’ if it expressly prohibits conduct that causes ‘physical or psychological harm in light of the age of the victim in question.” Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16449 (quoting Medina-Villa, 567 F.3d at 513).

The Ninth Circuit then turned to identifying the elements of California unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under § 261.5(d). “On its face, section 261.5(d) contains the following elements: (1) sexual intercourse with another person; (2) the defendant was at least 21 years of age at the time of intercourse; and (3) the other person was under the age of 16 years at the time of intercourse.” Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16449. Importantly, the Ninth Circuit affirmed its earlier determination in Quintero-Salazar v. Keisler, 506 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 2007), that § 261.d(5) does not include a scienter requirement—that is, there is no requirement that the act have been performed knowingly. Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16449.

Finally, the Ninth Circuit compared the elements of California’s offense with the elements of the generic offense of sexual abuse of a minor in Estrada-Martinez and Medina-Villa. Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16449-50. The Court had no trouble holding that the California offense is broader than the federal generic offense under Estrada-Martinez “because a defendant could be convicted under section 261.5(d) even if the government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant ‘knowingly’ engaged in a sexual act.” Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16450.

The Ninth Circuit then examined the California offense alongside the elements identified in Medina-Villa. Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16451. The Court found that the California offense and the Medina-Villa interpretation of sexual abuse of a minor share two elements—(1) a prohibition of sexual intercourse with (2) a minor. Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16451. “But section 261.5(d) criminalizes a broader range of conduct than the crime delineated in Medina-Villa because a defendant could be convicted under section 261.5(d) even if the government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s conduct constituted ‘abuse.’” Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16451.

As such, the Ninth Circuit determined that the California offense of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor “does not qualify as the generic federal crime of ‘sexual abuse of a minor,’ and therefore is not categorically an aggravated felony” under INA § 101(a)(43)(A).

The Ninth Circuit noted that it could not apply a modified categorical analysis in this case because there was not sufficient evidence in the record to justify a modified analysis. Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder, No. 05-70929, slip op. at 16453.

Comments

  16. Wyeth effexor xr.

    Effexor xr. Effexor xr and wellbutrin xl. Difference between effexor and effexor xr. Effexor xr and diabetis. How long do effexor xr side effects last for. Effexor xr chronic pain management. Effexor buy effexor xr online starting from.

    Reply

  38. Buy fioricet online that ships to missouri.

    Buy fioricet bloghoster. Buy fioricet online that ships to missouri. Buy fioricet. Buy fioricet full information amp low prices.

    Reply

  42. 2 celebrex celecoxib cox.

    Celebrex celecoxib http wwwinjuryboardcom viewcfm topic. Celebrex celecoxib alabama. Arthritis pain relief celebrex celecoxib capsules. Celebrex celecoxib murrysville pennsylvania. Celebrex celecoxib qoclick. Celebrex celecoxib nevada. Celebrex celecoxib hawaii. Celebrex celecoxib umaxppc. Celebrex celecoxib madisonburg pennsylvania.

    Reply

  54. Weews com search results xanax online pharmacy.

    Order xanax bars without prescription online. Order xanax online. Buy xanax online. No rx online xanax. Buy xanax online no prescriptions.

    Reply

  58. Carisoprodol soma drug test.

    Pdr carisoprodol soma. Soma carisoprodol you can found more info here. Soma carisoprodol abuse information. Get soma carisoprodol to effectively relieve pain. Tramadol meprobamate carisoprodol soma drug test.

    Reply

  70. Buy soma online.

    Buy soma. Buy soma watson brand 180 tablets. Buy soma online. Buy soma cheap. Buy soma watson brand online 150 tablets. Soma online soma buy soma online. Buy domain onlinevcvpl soma. Cyclobenzaprine buy prescription soma zanaflex.

    Reply

  80. Dr peak order phentermine.

    Order phentermine online today. Order phentermine online uk. Order phentermine uk. Order cheap phentermine. Order phentermine online. Adipexdrug addiction order phentermine online. Order phentermine 37.5mg without rx.

    Reply

  101. Discount xanax online.

    Xanax online without prescription. Buy xanax online without perscription. 2 mg xanax online pharmacy. Online medical questionnaire xanax. Buy xanax online. Xanax online no prescription. Discount xanax online.

    Reply

  102. building solar panels

    Do you have a spam issue on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; many of us have created some nice practices and we are looking to swap solutions with others, why not shoot me an email if interested.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.