crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

SCOTUS: “Physical force” defined as violent force in statute identical to “crime of violence” definition; affirms Leocal’s definition of COV aggravated felony

 The U.S. Supreme Court held this week that the phrase “physical force” means “violent force” for purposes of a statute that uses the exact language as the statutory definition of “crime of violence.” Johnson v. United States, No. 08-6925, slip op. (March 2, 2010) (Scalia, Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor). Scalia wrote for the majority; Alito dissented and was joined by Thomas.

This case involved a conviction for Florida’s felony offense of battery, Fla. Stat. § 784.03(1)(a), (2). The question before the Court was whether the battery conviction constitutes a “violent felony” for purposes of sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). A “violent felony” is defined, in relevant part, as an offense that “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i).

This definition exactly matches the definition of “crime of violence,” 18 U.S.C. § 16(a), referenced by the crime of violence category of aggravated felony, INA § 101(a)(43)(F). As such, the Court’s interpretation of this phrase is significant to immigration attorneys. Indeed, the Court turned to its decision in Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (2004), in which it addressed the definition of “crime of violence” for purposes of determining whether an LPR had been convicted of an aggravated felony. Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 5-6 (discussing Leocal, 543 U.S. at 11). In Leocal, the Court held, “The ordinary meaning of this term [crime of violence], combined with § 16’s emphasis on the use of physical force against another person…suggests a category of violent, active crimes….” Leocal, 543 U.S. at 11.

In Johnson, the Court adapted this interpretation of “physical force” to the definition of “violent felony.” Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 6. The Court clearly announced, “We think it clear that in the context of a statutory definition of “violent felony,” the phrase “physical force” means violent force—that is, force capable of causing physical pain or injury to another person.” Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 6.

The dissent criticized the majority’s holding because, in the view of Justices Alito and Thomas, it will undermine DHS’s ability to remove non-citizens convicted of assault or battery offenses in many states. Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 6-7 (Alito, J., dissenting). Alito cited to statutes in 28 states, including Arizona, California, Texas, Massachusetts, and Virginia, which he thinks are affected by the majority’s position. Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 7 n.3 (Alito, J., dissenting).

According to Alito, “Although the great majority of convictions under these statutes are, no doubt, based on the use of violent force, the effect of the Court’s decision will be to take all these convictions outside the scope of ACCA—unless the Government is able to produce documents that may properly be consulted under the modified categorical approach and that conclusively show that the offender’s conduct involved the use of violent force.” Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 7-8 (Alito, J., dissenting).

The majority responds that this is an “exaggerat[ion].” Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 10. Under the modified categorical approach allowed by Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 26 (2005), and Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602 (1990), the  majority points out, courts can and do “consult[] the trial record—including charging documents, plea agreements, transcripts of plea colloquies, findings of fact and conclusions of law from a bench trial, and jury instructions and verdict forms.” Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 10.

Because the Johnson Court defined the physical force needed for a “violent felony” by borrowing from Leocal’s definition of the physical force needed for a “crime of violence,” the greatest benefit that this case offers to immigration attorneys is likely its reiteration of that interpretation of physical force. The Court has signaled that the physical force required for violent offenses—whether termed “crime of violence” or “violent felony”—is indeed a “violent force,” rather than a mere touching.

Because the Florida battery offense allows for a conviction based on “any intentional physical contact, ‘no matter how slight,’” the Johnson Court held that this offense is not a violent felony. Johnson, No. 08-6925, slip op. at 11.  Presumably, therefore, Florida battery also does not constitute a crime of violence.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on March 4, 2010 on 10:11 am 20 Comments
Filed Under: aggravated felony, crime of violence, U.S. Supreme Court

Comments

  1. Buy cheap tramadol mg tablets only in us online. says

    March 30, 2010 at 1:07 am

    Buy tramadol.

    Buy tramadol online save wholesale price yep. Buy tramadol the lowest prices chtiblog com. Buy tramadol. Buy cheap tramadol mg tablets only in us online. Tramadol great buy.

    Reply
  2. Buy xanax. says

    April 10, 2010 at 5:25 am

    Buy xanax without prescription.

    Buy xanax. Buy xanax without prescription overnight delivery. Buy xanax cheap medication 34437.

    Reply
  3. Buy strattera. says

    April 11, 2010 at 12:26 am

    Buy strattera.

    Buy strattera.

    Reply
  4. Hydrocodone. says

    April 11, 2010 at 11:23 pm

    Hydrocodone without a prescription.

    Hydrocodone order. Hydrocodone without prescription. Hydrocodone. Hydrocodone online.

    Reply
  5. Where to buy xanax online without a prescription. says

    April 12, 2010 at 10:45 pm

    Cheap xanax online buy cheap xanax buy cheap xanax.

    Buy xanax online. Search results buy xanax online. Buy xanax precrition needed. Buy xanax no prescription. Buy xanax without precription. Buy cheap xanax without prescription.

    Reply
  6. Effects of long term percocet use. says

    April 13, 2010 at 10:11 pm

    No prescription percocet.

    Percocet 93-490. Potent lortab percocet darvon. Is darvocet stronger than percocet. Percocet.

    Reply
  7. Buy fioricet. says

    April 14, 2010 at 1:21 am

    Buy fioricet.

    Buy fioricet bloghoster. Buy fioricet online that ships to missouri. Buy fioricet. Buy fioricet full information amp low prices.

    Reply
  8. Buy tramadol online cod. says

    April 14, 2010 at 11:22 pm

    Buy tramadol.

    Buy soma and tramadol. Buy tramadol.

    Reply
  9. Tramadol hydrochloride. says

    April 16, 2010 at 8:11 am

    Tramadol hydrochloride.

    Tramadol hydrochloride. Tramadol hydrochloride for dogs. Hydrochloride tramadol.

    Reply
  10. Buy tramadol. says

    April 16, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    Buy tramadol.

    Buy tramadol online. Buy tramadol. Buy cheap tramadol. Buy cheap tramadol online 35009 buy.

    Reply
  11. Phentermine adipex. says

    April 18, 2010 at 12:24 am

    Adipex phentermine vs.

    Adipex phentermine vs. Adipex phentermine no script. Cheap phentermine and adipex without prescription.

    Reply
  12. Buy tramadol. says

    April 20, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    Buy tramadol free shipping.

    Buy tramadol. Buy cheap tramadol online 35009.

    Reply
  13. Strattera online. says

    April 21, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    Strattera online.

    Strattera online.

    Reply
  14. Buy adderall online. says

    April 22, 2010 at 2:06 am

    Buy adderall online no prescription needed.

    Buy adderall online. Adderall dallas buy blackmarket. Buy adderall without a prescription. Buying adderall online pharmacy. Buy adderall overnight delivery no rx. Buy generic adderall without prescription. Buy adderall online without a prescription. Buy generic adderall no prescription.

    Reply
  15. CheAp OAkley DiSpAtch II says

    July 25, 2013 at 9:51 am

    CheAp OAkley DiSpAtch II

    All right this YouTube video is much improved than previous one, this one has nice picture quality as well as audio.

    Reply
  16. ugg boots cheap says

    December 16, 2013 at 8:03 am

    ugg boots cheap

    where can you get cheap uggs online

    Reply
  17. ugg cheap says

    December 19, 2013 at 11:38 am

    ugg cheap

    cheap ugg kensington uk

    Reply
  18. carte r4i sdhc says

    March 8, 2014 at 4:47 pm

    carte r4i sdhc

    Thanks for a wonderful share You Have Offered to us with This kind of an large collection of info. Fantastic operate done by sharing You Have Them to all. Merely excellent

    Reply
  19. Maillot de foot Pas cher says

    March 12, 2014 at 8:40 pm

    Maillot de foot Pas cher

    Extremely excellent composed post. It will be supportive to anybody who makes use of it, like me. Hold performing what you are carrying out a?? cana??r wait to study a lot more posts.

    Reply
  20. ksxbsrji says

    April 6, 2014 at 7:55 pm

    ksxbsrji

    crImmigration.com: SCOTUS: “Physical force” defined as violent force in statute identical to “crime of violence” definition; affirms Leocal’s definition of COV aggravated felony

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Biden’s Migration Policy Options
  • Migrating to Prison, one year later
  • With Biden returning to White House, private prison stock falls
  • New York Review of Books
  • Justice Dept pushes Supreme Court to Imperil Families
  • Fund Immigrant Defense, Promote Justice

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.