crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

9th Circuit: California selling marijuana to minor is controlled substance offense

In a published decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a conviction for “‘furnish[ing], administer[ing], or giv[ing], or offer[ing] to furnish, administer, or give,’ marijuana to a minor older than fourteen,” a violation of Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11361(b), categorically constitutes a controlled substance offense under INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i). Guerrero-Silva v. Holder, No. 05-77420, slip op. (March 31, 2010) (Hug, Bybee, and Gwin). Judge Bybee wrote the panel’s decision.

This case involved an LPR who entered the USA as a two-year-old. At some undisclosed period later, he was convicted of violating Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11361(b). DHS initiated removal proceedings based on this conviction.

According to the Ninth Circuit,

California Health and Safety Code § 11361(b) provides: ‘Every person 18 years of age or over who furnishes, administers, or gives, or offers to furnish, administer, or give, any marijuana to a minor 14 years of age or older shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of three, four, or five years.’

This statute, the Court easily concluded, “‘relates to a controlled substance’” “because federal law lists marijuana as a controlled substance, 21 U.S.C. §§ 802(6), 812(b)(1)(C).” Guerrero-Silva, No. 05-77420, slip. op. at 5063.

The exception for “a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana” is inapplicable to this statute, the Court added, “because the actions California Health and Safety Code § 11361(b) prohibits—‘furnish[ing], administer[ing], or giv[ing], or offer[ing] to furnish, administer, or give’—are actions that, by definition, do not include ‘possession for one’s own use.” Guerrero-Silva, No. 05-77420, slip. op. at 5063.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on April 9, 2010 on 10:31 am 1 Comment
Filed Under: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, controlled substance offense

Comments

  1. christian laboutin says

    June 13, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    Christian Louboutin Links:
    Christian Louboutin
    christian louboutin shoes sale
    christian louboutin replica shoes
    christian louboutin shoes saks
    christian louboutin shoes uk
    louboutin shoes
    christian louboutin shoes
    christian louboutin boots
    christian louboutin pumps
    cheap christian louboutin
    christian louboutin sale
    christian louboutin sandals
    discount christian louboutin
    sale christian louboutin
    pumps christian louboutin
    christian pumps
    shoes christian louboutin
    christian louboutin heels
    christian heels
    christian louboutin wedges
    christian louboutin shoe
    christian laboutin
    laboutin shoes

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Uvalde massacre & immigration law aid
  • Mistakes aren’t reviewable, Supreme Court says
  • ICE prosecutorial discretion guidance
  • Supreme Court again considers ICE’s detention powers
  • Troubled contractor gets $180 million to hold young migrants
  • Chronicling Arizona’s Immigration Politics

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.