crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

A federal judge in Arizona slammed the tactics used by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) during a February 2009 raid of a landscaping business in Phoenix. Mora v. Arpaio, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. (D. Az. April 25, 2011). District court judge David Campbell issued the order.

This case involved lawful permanent resident Julian Mora and his United States citizen son Julio Mora who were on their way to Julian’s workplace, Handyman Maintenance, Inc. (HMI), where Julian was going to work and Julio was headed in search of work. About 100 meters before reaching HMI, the Moras “were suddenly stopped by the John Doe Deputies—one of the officers’
vehicles cutting in front of Plaintiffs’ truck and the other blocking the truck from behind.” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 5.

They were promptly arrested when Julian explained that he worked at HMI, where MCSO officers, under the command of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, were conducting a search for evidence of identify theft and forgery.  “[T]he Deputies ordered them out of the truck, handcuffed them with hard plastic ‘zip-ties,’ and took them to the HMI yard where they were detained for nearly three hours.” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 7. Once there, “Julian was repeatedly denied permission to relieve himself for nearly an hour, …they remained handcuffed throughout the duration of the search and the tightness of the zip-tie on Julio’s wrists caused pain, and … they were released only after answering questions about their identities and lawful presence in this country.” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 10.

The Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Moras on their claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that MCSO, through the deputies’ actions, violated their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search or seizure. Summary judgment is granted only when there are no genuine issues of material fact remaining, thus the moving party must win. Fed. Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a). In essence, even if the court viewed the facts in the most favorable way possible for the officers, the court concluded that the stop still violated the Constitution.

Addressing the constitutionality of the deputies’ stop, as Judge Campbell explained, “[f]or a law enforcement officer ‘to initiate an investigatory stop of a motorist, there must at least exist reasonable suspicion that the motorist is engaging in illegal activity.’” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 4 (quoting Liberal v. Estrada, 632 F.3d 1064, 1077 (9th cir. 2011)).

The Court had little trouble determining that “when the John Doe Deputies stopped Plaintiffs, they had no suspicion, reasonable or otherwise, that Plaintiffs were in violation of the traffic laws or engaged in criminal activity.” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 5. Consequently, the Court found that the plaintiffs were stopped in violation of their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure. Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 7.

The Court then addressed whether the Moras were arrested in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable seizures. “Under the Fourth Amendment, a warrantless arrest is constitutional only if it is based on probable cause.” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 8 (citing United States v. Thornton, 710 F.2d 513, 515 (9th Cir. 1983)). “Probable cause is ‘defined in terms of facts and circumstances sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the suspect had committed or was committing an offense.’” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 8 (quoting Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 111-12 (1975)).

Because “the only fact supporting Plaintiffs’ arrest is the statement by Julian that he was an HMI employee,” the Court determined that a prudent person would not have concluded that father or son had committed or were committing a criminal offense. Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 9. As such, “[t]he Court finds that the warrantless arrest of Plaintiffs was made without probable cause and, therefore, in violation of the Fourth Amendment.” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 9. The Court then turned to whether the Moras were detained unconstitutionally. As the Court explained, “‘the police may detain a building’s occupants while officers execute a search warrant as long as the detention is reasonable.’” Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 10 (quoting Dawson v. City of Seattle, 435 F.3d 1054, 1064 (9th Cir. 2006)). Though the Court found the plaintiffs’ arguments that they were detained unreasonably to have “some persuasive force,” it declined to decide the matter. Instead, the Court determined that material facts remain in dispute; therefore, it is appropriate for a jury to determine whether the MCSO officers’ acted unreasonably. Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 10.

Because the Moras “presented substantial evidence showing that they were stopped and arrested as a result of MCSO’s well-established policies and standard operating procedures for employer immigration raids, as promulgated and ratified by Sheriff Arpaio,” the county is subject to liability as a result of MCSO’s unconstitutional behavior. Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 11-12.

The Court then denied all efforts by the MCSO, Arpaio in his official and personal capacities, and individual officers to obtain judgment on the Moras’ claims prior to trial except those that the Moras conceded. Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 13. The surviving claims mostly involve tort allegations against individual officers and Arpaio, including false arrest, false imprisonment, assault, and battery. Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 13. Importantly, the Court allowed the claims against Arpaio in his private, personal capacity to go forward. Mora, No. CV-09-1719-PHX-DGC, slip op. at 16.

More information about this case is available from the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project.

Update (July 8, 2011): The ACLU of Arizona reports that the MCSO agreed to pay the Moras $200,000 to settle this lawsuit.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on April 27, 2011 on 8:53 am 68 Comments
Filed Under: U.S. District Courts

Comments

  1. payday loans says

    May 8, 2013 at 1:48 pm

    payday loans

    I’ve a couple of question to you personally, create to those I don’t e-mail

    Reply
  2. electronic cigarette groupon says

    May 12, 2013 at 5:43 am

    ecig

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  3. http://www.amazon.com/Garcinia-Pure-180-Capsules-Cambogia/dp/B00AVYYP2O/ says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:33 am

    http://www.amazon.com/Garcinia-Pure-180-Capsules-Cambogia/dp/B00AVYYP2O/

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  4. 7 keto for weight loss says

    May 12, 2013 at 7:00 am

    7 keto

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  5. garcinia pure says

    May 12, 2013 at 7:17 am

    garcinia cambogia

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  6. http://buy7keto.webs.com says

    May 12, 2013 at 7:21 am

    buy 7 keto

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  7. Phentermine diet pills says

    May 12, 2013 at 8:01 am

    Phentermine 37.5

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  8. Reverse Phone Lookup says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:22 am

    Reverse Lookup

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  9. Donald Ray Bernard says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:44 am

    Donald Ray Bernard

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  10. e cigarette coupons says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:24 pm

    electronic cigarette parts

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  11. http://cigaretts.webs.com says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:28 pm

    best e cigs

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  12. http://www.databytez.com/ says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:28 pm

    e cigarette coupons

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  13. best e cigarettes says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:35 pm

    electronic cigarettes utah

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  14. buy provigil online says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:38 pm

    provigil

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  15. cialis directions says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:41 pm

    acquisto cialis

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  16. lifelock promo code says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:43 pm

    lifelock promotion code

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  17. electronic cigarettes online says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    buy e cigarette

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  18. electronic cigarette coupons says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:47 pm

    http://www.databytez.com/

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  19. christmas lumber says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    christmas movies

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  20. board games says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:05 pm

    http://thechristmasgame.co.uk

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  21. buy modafinil australia says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:06 pm

    modafinil australia

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  22. christmas tree shop flyer says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:09 pm

    christmas board game

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  23. vaporizer for weed says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:12 pm

    vaporizer pen for weed

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  24. modafinil online says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:17 pm

    modafinil erowid

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  25. buy electronic cigarettes says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:20 pm

    buy electronic cigarettes

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  26. board games says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:25 pm

    christmas vacation

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  27. vaporizer hookah says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:30 pm

    volcano vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  28. escort london says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:34 pm

    london escort

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  29. buy modafinil says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:36 pm

    buy modafinil

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  30. Anonymous says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:37 pm

    http://runninggirls.co.uk

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  31. best e cigs says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    electronic cigarettes exposed

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  32. vaporizer says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:45 pm

    vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  33. http://archive.org/details/buytramadol50mgonline says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:46 pm

    buy tramadol

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  34. vaporizer or humidifier says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:55 pm

    vaporizer whip

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  35. Anonymous says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:58 pm

    london escort

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  36. lifelock ultimate says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:06 pm

    lifelock promo code

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  37. lifelock promotion code says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:08 pm

    lifelock promotion code

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  38. lifelock promo code says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:12 pm

    lifelock promotion code

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  39. christmas board game says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:14 pm

    christmas board game

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  40. london escort says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:14 pm

    http://runninggirls.co.uk

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  41. garcinia says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    garcinia extract

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  42. buy provigil says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:25 pm

    provigil

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  43. board games says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:29 pm

    board games

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  44. electronic cigarettes oklahoma city says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    electronic cigarettes ultd

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  45. http://buymodafinilonline200mg.webs.com says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:32 pm

    modafinil yawning

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  46. buy provigil online says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:35 pm

    buy provigil

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  47. best electronic cigarette says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    electronic cigarettes nicotine

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  48. modafinil india says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    http://buymodafinilonline200mg.webs.com

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  49. modafinil and alcohol says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:39 pm

    modafinil vs adderall

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  50. electronic cigarettes quitting says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:40 pm

    electronic cigarettes online

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  51. http://modafinilaustralia.webs.com says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:49 pm

    buy modafinil australia

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  52. cialis trial says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:55 pm

    cialis

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  53. board games says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:57 pm

    christmas board game

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  54. board games says

    May 14, 2013 at 7:01 pm

    christmas board game

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  55. tramadol says

    May 14, 2013 at 7:01 pm

    buy tramadol

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  56. vaporizer grasscity says

    May 14, 2013 at 7:02 pm

    vaporizer erbo

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  57. board games says

    May 16, 2013 at 7:29 am

    christmas nascar

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  58. modafinil how to get says

    May 16, 2013 at 7:39 am

    modafinil bulletproof

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  59. escort london says

    May 16, 2013 at 8:07 am

    london escort

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  60. pax vaporizer says

    May 16, 2013 at 8:22 am

    http://thevapechief.info

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  61. modafinil exercise says

    May 16, 2013 at 8:26 am

    modafinil india

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  62. buy modafinil australia online says

    May 16, 2013 at 8:36 am

    modafinil australia

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  63. modafinil schedule says

    May 16, 2013 at 9:06 am

    buy modafinil online

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  64. modafinil online says

    May 16, 2013 at 9:27 am

    modafinil online

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  65. modafinil online says

    May 16, 2013 at 10:16 am

    http://buymodafinilonline200mg.webs.com

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  66. tramadol withdrawal says

    May 16, 2013 at 10:21 am

    tramadol jaw clenching

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply
  67. ugg boots outlet online says

    December 26, 2013 at 12:43 pm

    ugg boots outlet online

    uggs bailey button for sale

    Reply
  68. oragin Louis Vuitton Bags says

    March 8, 2014 at 9:59 pm

    oragin Louis Vuitton Bags

    crImmigration.com: US District Ct: Arpaio raid violates 4th Amend, might lead to tort liability

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Federal court enjoins 100-day deportation pause
  • ICE issues enforcement priorities
  • Immigration possibilities & challenges
  • Criminal bars, policing changes, & meaningful reforms in proposed legislation
  • Private prison policy excludes DHS, but impacts migrants
  • Expedited removal & 287(g) survive Biden review, so far

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.