crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

Archive

After regularly updating crimmigration.com from January 2009 until November 2022, I have stopped doing so. I hope you continue to benefit from the blog as an archive. For up-to-date information about my work, visit ccgarciahernandez.com. – César

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

BIA: 212(h) waiver can’t overcome crime-based cancellation bar for non-LPRs

Last month the BIA held that a waiver under INA § 212(h) cannot overcome ineligibility for cancellation of removal as a result of having been convicted of an offense under INA § 212(a)(2). Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. 564 (BIA 2011) (Pauley, Wendtland, and Greer, Board Members). Board Member Wendtland wrote the panel’s decision.

This case involved an individual who entered without inspection and was convicted of possession of not more than 20 grams of marijuana, Fla. § 893.13(6)(b). Bustamante conceded removability because he was neither admitted nor paroled, then sought cancellation of removal for non-LPRs under INA § 240A(b). Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. at 564-65.

The government argued that he was ineligible for cancellation because his marijuana possession conviction constituted an inadmissible offense under INA § 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) (controlled substances offenses). As a result, the government added, he was ineligible for cancellation because § 240A(b)(1)(C) requires an applicant to show that he “has not been convicted of an offense under 212(a)(2)” or other statutory sections not applicable here. The IJ agreed with the government’s position. Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. at 564-65.

On appeal to the BIA, the Board addresses “whether section 212(h) can waive the effect of a conviction for an offense under section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II)…to overcome the bar to cancellation of removal under section 240A(b)(1)(C).” Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. at 565.

The BIA does not appear to have had much difficulty deciding that a § 212(h) waiver cannot overcome the crime-based basis of ineligibility for cancellation for non-LPRs. The Board’s conclusion turns on what it views as the subject of § 212(h)’s waiver power. To the Board, § 212(h) waives the ground of inadmissibility found in § 212(a)(2); it does not waive commission of the offense or a conviction.

To put it another way, § 212(h) does not erase the fact of conviction; it merely waives the effect that such a conviction has on an applicant for admission (inadmissibility). As the Board explained, “we have stated that ‘w[e] interpret section 212(h), which waives the application of…[section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II)], to mean that it is the ground of inadmissibility—rather than the offense or the conviction—whose  application may be waived.’” Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. at 567.

The cancellation statutory provision, in contrast, is concerned only with the fact of conviction. “Therefore, a waiver of inadmissibility is not pertinent to the criteria for eligibility set forth in section 240A(b)(1)(C).” Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. at 569.

For cancellation purposes, all that matters is whether the cancellation applicant was convicted of an offense that falls within INA § 212(a)(2). In the BIA’s words, “where an alien who is inadmissible by reason of a conviction is granted a waiver, the conviction is not nullified. Only the application of the ground of inadmissibility resulting from the conviction is waived, not any other immigration-related consequence.” Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. at 569-70. Bustamante, therefore, was properly found ineligible for cancellation, the Board concluded. Matter of Bustamante, 25 I&N Dec. at 570.

See Jacqueline Scott Brown’s blog about this decision too.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on August 16, 2011 on 9:00 am 8 Comments
Filed Under: 212(h), Board of Immigration Appeals, cancellation of removal, waiver

Comments

  1. best money making online says

    June 22, 2012 at 12:07 am

    best money making online

    […]crImmigration.com: BIA: 212(h) waiver can’t overcome crime-based cancellation bar for non-LPRs[…]

    Reply
  2. site says

    June 22, 2012 at 4:56 am

    site

    […]crImmigration.com: BIA: 212(h) waiver can’t overcome crime-based cancellation bar for non-LPRs[…]

    Reply
  3. maillot psg 2013 says

    June 7, 2013 at 3:11 am

    maillot psg 2013

    this is great blog, I will certainly be back.

    Reply
  4. rayban says

    June 23, 2013 at 11:44 pm

    rayban

    It laborious to seek out knowledgeable people on this subject, but you sound like you already know what you?e speaking about! Thanks

    Reply
  5. gaiss says

    June 25, 2013 at 4:40 am

    gaiss

    I wanted to post you the very small word just to thank you so much again for your fantastic guidelines you have documented in this case. It’s tremendously generous of people like you to deliver easily exactly what numerous people might have supplied for an e-book in order to make some dough for their own end, most notably considering the fact that you could possibly have tried it if you ever considered necessary. These suggestions also worked to provide a great way to be certain that someone else have a similar fervor like my personal own to grasp more with reference to this condition. I think there are numerous more fun situations ahead for people who scan through your blog post.

    Reply
  6. Cheap Oakley Men's Sunglasses says

    July 19, 2013 at 12:02 pm

    Cheap Oakley Men’s Sunglasses

    My grand father every time used to watch YouTube comic video clips, hehehehehe, as he desires to be glad forever.

    Reply
  7. Cheap Oakley Whisker says

    July 26, 2013 at 10:50 am

    Cheap Oakley Whisker

    crImmigration.com: BIA: 212(h) waiver can’t overcome crime-based cancellation bar for non-LPRs

    Reply
  8. Fake Oakley SUnglasses says

    July 31, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    Fake Oakley SUnglasses

    crImmigration.com: BIA: 212(h) waiver can’t overcome crime-based cancellation bar for non-LPRs

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Pelosi attacker reportedly Canadian overstayer
  • Biden marijuana pardon meets immigration law & fizzles
  • California private prison ban is illegal, 9th Circuit says
  • Citizenship is complicated
  • Supreme Court says Biden can end MPP
  • Uvalde massacre & immigration law aid

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.