Scholars Sidebar: SCOTUS holds § 212(c) comparable grounds requirement is arbitrary and capricious
In December
the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the comparable grounds rule that had long
been used to determine whether an individual facing deportation could seek
relief under former INA § 212(c). Judulang v. Holder, No. 10-694, slip op. (U.S. Dec. 12, 2011). I wrote an article
for LexisNexis analyzing the Supreme Court’s decision and its relevance for
immigration practitioners. U.S. Supreme Court Holds BIA’s Comparable-Grounds Requirement for § 212(c) Relief is Arbitrary and Capricious, 2011 Emerging Issues 6164 (2011). The terms of my
agreement with Lexis don’t allow me to make it available here for free, but
interested readers can find it in the Lexis database (in the Emerging Issues
Analyses section) or purchase it from the Lexis web site.


It's supreme court,thathas done the job as section 212(c) isan important section of INA.
Reply to this