crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony is on respondent; says categorical approach inapplicable

The BIA held that the burden of proof rests with the noncitizen respondent to show that a possession of marijuana with intent to distribute conviction is not an aggravated felony because it involved a “small” amount of the drug, and that the respondent may prove this by using evidence outside the record of conviction. Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. 698 (BIA 2012) (Pauley, Mullane, and Guendelsberger, Board members). Board member Pauley wrote the panel’s decision.

This case involved an LPR convicted of possession with the intent to give or distribute less than one-half ounce of marijuana. Va. Rev. Stat. § 18.2-248.1(a)(1). The IJ concluded that this constituted a controlled substances offense, but not an aggravated felony under the illicit trafficking in a controlled substance subsection, INA § 101(a)(43)(B). Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 699.

The BIA relied on its decision in Matter of Aruna, 24 I&N Dec. 452 (BIA 2008), in which it explained that the federal felony conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance offense, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(D), allows for the consideration of evidence outside the record of conviction for the purpose of reducing the felony offense to a  misdemeanor. Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 701 (citing United States v. Hamlin, 319 F.3d 666, 670-71 (4th Cir. 2003)).

This “mitigation exception,” the Board added, is not an element of the federal offense, thus “the categorical approach is not applicable to a determination of these facts”—that is, relying on evidence outside the record of conviction may prove mitigation eligibility. Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 701. As additional support for abandoning the categorical approach that normally dictates analysis of the INA, the Board turned to Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009), in which the Supreme Court condoned looking outside the record of conviction to determine whether a theft offense involved a loss of $10,000 or more because this information was not usually an element required for conviction.

The “circumstance-specific” approach used in Nijhawan, the BIA concluded, is appropriate for determining whether a possession of marijuana with intent to distribute conviction involved a “small” amount of marijuana and no
remuneration was involved. Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 702. If these criteria are satisfied—that is, the conviction involved a small amount of marijuana and no remuneration—than it does not meet the illicit trafficking definition of aggravated felony. Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 699 n.2.

Proving that a small amount was involved and no remuneration was present, the Board continued, is up to the respondent. This is because to receive the benefit of the mitigation exception in the federal possession context, the criminal defendant “bears the burden of proving the additional facts that trigger this mitigating exception, namely, the ‘smallness’ of the amount of marijuana and the absence of remuneration.” Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 701 (citing Hamlin, 319 F.3d at 671).

The less than 30 grams of marijuana involved in Castro Rodriguez’s offense (though not his conviction), the Board added, “may, in general, serve as a useful guidepost in determining whether an amount is “small’.” Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 703. However, because no evidence was introduced regarding whether Castro Rodriguez was convicted with the intent to receive remuneration, the Board remanded. Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. at 704.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on May 17, 2012 on 9:00 am 43 Comments
Filed Under: aggravated felony, Board of Immigration Appeals, burden, conspiracy, controlled substance offense, illicit trafficking

Comments

  1. Creg Matthews says

    May 18, 2012 at 11:26 am

    The quantity should not matter here, as possessing marijuana is illegal

    Reply
  2. http://www.paydayday.co.uk/ says

    January 13, 2013 at 12:05 am

    http://www.paydayday.co.uk/

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony is on respondent; says categorical approach inapplicable

    Reply
  3. car valuation melbourne says

    May 12, 2013 at 12:57 am

    car valuation services

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  4. http://mi5615.wix.com/mobilebingo says

    May 12, 2013 at 2:08 am

    mobile bingo sites

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  5. electronic cigarette weed says

    May 12, 2013 at 2:24 am

    electronic cigarette accessories

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  6. where can I buy 7 keto says

    May 12, 2013 at 2:38 am

    what is 7 keto

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  7. Phentermine 37.5 says

    May 12, 2013 at 2:40 am

    Phentermine sale

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  8. credit consolidation regina says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:41 am

    http://creditconsolidationusa.org

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  9. Reverse Phone Lookup says

    May 12, 2013 at 5:09 am

    Reverse Phone Lookup

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  10. hgh dosage says

    May 12, 2013 at 5:59 am

    hgh booster

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  11. donald j. bernard says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:07 am

    Don Varden Eric J. Carr

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  12. e cig says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:29 am

    http://www.ecigarretenews.com

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  13. garcinia says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:36 am

    garcinia pure

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  14. lifelock yahoo says

    May 15, 2013 at 4:28 pm

    lifelock promo

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  15. buy modafinil australia says

    May 15, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    buy modafinil in australia online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  16. volcano vaporizer says

    May 15, 2013 at 4:57 pm

    pax vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  17. the christmas game says

    May 15, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    christmas quilting fabric

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  18. escort london says

    May 15, 2013 at 6:14 pm

    london escorts

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  19. lifelock promo code says

    May 15, 2013 at 6:20 pm

    lifelock promotional code

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  20. http://runninggirls.co.uk says

    May 15, 2013 at 6:38 pm

    escorts london

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  21. lifelock promo says

    May 15, 2013 at 7:07 pm

    lifelock iphone 5 case

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  22. cialis black says

    May 15, 2013 at 7:08 pm

    cialis just for fun

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  23. modafinil australia says

    May 15, 2013 at 10:44 pm

    buy modafinil australia

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  24. vaporizer essential oils says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:14 pm

    pax vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  25. lifelock quote says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:19 pm

    lifelock promo code

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  26. cialis generico says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:27 pm

    cialis headache

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  27. garcinia extract says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:50 pm

    garcinia pure

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  28. the christmas game says

    May 16, 2013 at 12:00 am

    christmas hymns

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  29. tramadol says

    May 16, 2013 at 12:41 am

    tramadol online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  30. pax vaporizer says

    May 16, 2013 at 12:51 am

    vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  31. vaporizer vs bong says

    May 16, 2013 at 1:04 am

    vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  32. provigil kidney says

    May 16, 2013 at 7:44 am

    provigil online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  33. vaporizer temp says

    May 16, 2013 at 8:17 am

    vaporizer bong

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  34. cialis erection says

    May 16, 2013 at 8:17 am

    acquisto cialis

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  35. cialis says

    May 16, 2013 at 9:00 am

    cialis generico

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  36. board games says

    May 16, 2013 at 9:23 am

    http://thechristmasgame.co.uk

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  37. lifelock promo code says

    May 16, 2013 at 9:35 am

    lifelock promo

    crImmigration.com: BIA: Burden to show possession with intent to distribute isn’t aggravated felony

    Reply
  38. slimming soft gel says

    May 19, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    slimming soft gel

    The load maps using real acai berry pulp plan is it doesn’t involve demanding exercising or a full interference of your respective otherwise occupied way of living. This kind of foodstuff in the Rain forest differs from the others around slimming soft gel just what it gives your total development and growth while harmful extra fat absent.

    Reply
  39. new york auto insurance says

    July 16, 2013 at 11:57 pm

    new york auto insurance

    http://hurriedfixationwebpage.wallinside.com

    Reply
  40. oakleys home says

    August 3, 2013 at 2:38 am

    oakleys home

    Okay you are right, YouTube is most excellent video distribution web page, since YouTube is a lightly no much streaming time rather than other sites.

    Reply
  41. uggs outlet online says

    December 23, 2013 at 12:06 am

    uggs outlet online

    fake uggs cheap price

    Reply
  42. boutique football says

    March 10, 2014 at 11:51 pm

    boutique football

    Hertz workplace. Extended tale brief, she made like she was doing work there, and the up coming factor you know

    Reply
  43. maillot du psg 2013 says

    March 12, 2014 at 5:53 pm

    maillot du psg 2013

    The website You have write is extremely nicely written and extremely insightful many thanks for great posta?|

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Biden-Harris immigration priorities signal big shift, raise many questions
  • Biden’s Migration Policy Options
  • Migrating to Prison, one year later
  • With Biden returning to White House, private prison stock falls
  • New York Review of Books
  • Justice Dept pushes Supreme Court to Imperil Families

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.