crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

Archive

After regularly updating crimmigration.com from January 2009 until November 2022, I have stopped doing so. I hope you continue to benefit from the blog as an archive. For up-to-date information about my work, visit ccgarciahernandez.com. – César

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in USA

A New York intermediate appellate court held that the prejudice inquiry performed as part of a Padilla claim must account for a noncitizen defendant’s desire to remain in the USA when determining whether it would have been rational to turn down a plea offer. People v. Picca, No. 2006-09056, 2010-10696, slip op. (N.Y. App. Div. June 6, 2012) (Skelos, Dickerson, Eng, and Sgroi, JJ.). Judge Skelos wrote the court’s decision.

This case involved an LPR who was convicted of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in 1997 and again in 2001. Picca, slip op. at 2-3. On direct appeal of the 2001 conviction, he argued that his plea-stage attorney failed to inform him of potential immigration consequences of conviction. His sentencing attorney (a different attorney than the plea-stage lawyer, but also a public defender at the same office) agreed that the plea-stage lawyer, who has since died, did not inform the defendant of these consequences. Picca, slip op. at 6. The defendant and his wife claimed that the defendant would have turned down the plea offer (which resulted in a conviction for immigration purposes and placement in a drug diversion program) in exchange for the possibility of avoiding deportation even if it meant risking more jail time. Picca, slip op. at 4.

If these allegations are true, then the defendant met the first of Strickland v. Washington’s two-pronged requirement for ineffective assistance of counsel: that plea-stage counsel fell below an objective standard of reasonable performance by failing to advise him of the potential immigration consequences of conviction. Picca, slip op. at 7.

Importantly, the court rejected the state’s claim that Padilla is triggered only when the defendant informs the attorney that he’s not a U.S. citizen. “This contention,” the court explained, “is logically flawed, as it presupposes that the defendant understands that his immigration status is relevant to the criminal proceedings.” Picca, slip op. at 7. The court could have added that this contention is also flawed because it presupposes that defendants know their citizenship status. Citizenship law, including the INA’s naturalization provisions, is so complicated that it is not at all unusual for individuals to believe that they are USCs when they’re not or that they are not USCs when they are.

The court then turned to whether plea-stage counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced the defendant. Here the court concluded that the prejudice inquiry must take into account the defendant’s desire to remain in the USA. It is insufficient to merely consider the potential maximum sentence available if convicted after trial versus the sentence offered in the plea. Picca, slip op. at 12.

Referring to a noncitizen defendant’s unique desire to avoid banishment, the court wrote: “Those particular circumstances must then be weighed along with other relevant factors, such as the strength of the People’s evidence, the potential sentence, and the effect of prior convictions. If, for example, an alien has significant ties to his or her country of origin, or has only resided in the United States for a relatively brief period of time, or has no family here, a decision to proceed to trial in lieu of a favorable plea agreement may be irrational in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt and a potentially lengthy prison sentence.” Picca, slip op. at 11.

Because the defendant had been here for over 30 years and his entire family resides here, however, “[w]e conclude that the defendant’s averments sufficiently alleged that a decision to reject the plea offer, and take a chance, however slim, of being acquitted after trial, would have been rational.” Picca, slip op. at 12. This conclusion was particularly striking given the existence of the 1997 conviction that itself is a removable offense, as the court acknowledges. Picca, slip op. at 12.

The appellate court found that the allegations about the lack of advice that the defendant received prior to pleading guilty, if true, and the consequence of being deported was sufficient to merit a hearing where the trial court could weigh everyone’s credibility. Because the trial court failed to conduct such a hearing, vacatur was required. Picca, slip op. at 14.

 

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on July 19, 2012 on 9:00 am 36 Comments
Filed Under: New York state court, Padilla v. Kentucky, post-conviction relief, right to counsel, state court

Comments

  1. payday loans says

    May 2, 2013 at 1:45 pm

    payday loans

    I’m a lengthy time watcher and I just believed I’d drop by and say hello there for the quite initial time.

    Reply
  2. Donald Bernard says

    May 12, 2013 at 2:51 am

    Donald Ray Bernard

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  3. http://www.revdir.com says

    May 12, 2013 at 3:18 am

    Reverse Lookup

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  4. how to get your ex back quickly and effectively says

    May 12, 2013 at 3:53 am

    http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/wrelationshipcom-tells-visitors-how-to-get-their-ex-back-using-the-no-contact-rule-247419.htm

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  5. Phentermine says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:55 am

    Phentermine sale

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  6. 7 keto gold weight loss reviews says

    May 12, 2013 at 5:01 am

    http://buy7keto.webs.com

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  7. http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/ebriefs/07/07028415.pdf says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:59 am

    Don Varden Eric J. Carr

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  8. hgh says

    May 12, 2013 at 7:05 am

    hgh online

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  9. car valuation new zealand free says

    May 12, 2013 at 7:58 am

    car valuation

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  10. car valuation australia online says

    May 12, 2013 at 8:19 am

    car valuation pune

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  11. car insurance tax deductible says

    May 12, 2013 at 8:25 am

    auto insurance quotes

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  12. internet marketing jobs says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:00 am

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/greg-dash/5b/390/697

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  13. http://creditconsolidationusa.org says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:25 am

    credit consolidation

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  14. ecig says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:56 am

    electronic cigarette

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  15. FakE OaklEy SunglaSSES says

    May 13, 2013 at 8:08 pm

    FakE OaklEy SunglaSSES

    If you believeI do not care to catch sight of this article, the next time I am paid more attention to about your article, I think I will never again careless. Do you believe in yourself, you do not know your article can make people so enchanted. [url=http://www.unv.org.ph/cheapoakleys.php]cheap oakley sunglasses[/url] [url=http://www.sunglassespub.net/]Fake Oakley Sunglasses[/url] [url=http://www.philmass.org/fr/longchamp.htm]Sac Longchamp[/url] [url=http://www.fr-longchampsac.net/]longchamp soldes[/url] [url=http://www.cheap-okoakleys.net/]Fake Oakleys Sunglasses[/url] [url=http://ray-ban.mall-us.net/]Cheap Ray Ban[/url] [url=http://www.cheapokoakleys.net/]fake cheap oakley sunglasses[/url] [url=http://www.fakeokoakleys-us.net/]fake oakley sunglasses[/url] [url=http://www.fr-longchams1948.net/]longchamps[/url] [url=http://www.fr-longchams1948.net/]sac à main longchamp[/url]

    Reply
  16. buy modafinil australia says

    May 17, 2013 at 10:23 am

    buy modafinil in australia online

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  17. debt consolidation x bankers says

    May 17, 2013 at 11:21 am

    credit card consolidation

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  18. news examiner says

    May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am

    news headlines

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  19. volcano vaporizer says

    May 17, 2013 at 11:43 am

    volcano vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  20. electronic cigarette says

    May 17, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    electronic cigarette

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  21. people's trust insurance reviews says

    May 17, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    trilegiant

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  22. phentermine equivalent says

    May 17, 2013 at 1:10 pm

    phentermine vs qsymia

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  23. phentermine hydrochloride says

    May 17, 2013 at 1:19 pm

    phentermine coupons

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in U

    Reply
  24. she says

    June 10, 2013 at 6:12 am

    she

    I intended to post you the tiny remark in order to thank you the moment again for these remarkable methods you’ve provided above. It has been particularly open-handed of people like you to provide freely what a few people could have marketed as an e book to help with making some bucks for themselves, especially now that you might well have tried it in case you wanted. The advice as well served as a good way to fully grasp most people have similar interest like my very own to understand many more with regard to this condition. I know there are millions of more enjoyable opportunities ahead for people who discover your site.

    Reply
  25. gaiss says

    June 27, 2013 at 4:13 am

    gaiss

    Would you be interested in exchanging links?

    Reply
  26. FAke OAkley Big TAco says

    July 5, 2013 at 8:27 pm

    FAke OAkley Big TAco

    This article is in fact a pleasant one it assists new web people, who are wishing for blogging.

    Reply
  27. Cheap Oakley Radar says

    July 15, 2013 at 11:55 am

    Cheap Oakley Radar

    Hmmm, yup no hesitation Google is best in support of blogging however today word press is also good as a blogging for the reason that its Search engine optimization is good defined already.

    Reply
  28. mulberry bags says

    July 16, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    mulberry bags

    Paul Bartush, Front Desk Manager, The Reach Resort.Report response as inappropriate

    Reply
  29. Cheap Oakley For Sale says

    July 25, 2013 at 8:54 pm

    Cheap Oakley For Sale

    Hello to all, the YouTube video that is posted at here has truly nice quality along with fastidious audio quality

    Reply
  30. Fake Oakley SUnglasses says

    July 27, 2013 at 12:33 pm

    Fake Oakley SUnglasses

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in USA

    Reply
  31. Fake Oakley Outlet says

    July 28, 2013 at 5:42 am

    Fake Oakley Outlet

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in USA

    Reply
  32. Replica Oakley C SIX says

    July 28, 2013 at 10:55 pm

    Replica Oakley C SIX

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in USA

    Reply
  33. Replica Oakley Radar Range says

    July 29, 2013 at 7:35 pm

    Replica Oakley Radar Range

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in USA

    Reply
  34. uerdnuhcdfa says

    March 6, 2014 at 9:24 pm

    uerdnuhcdfa

    Agree with your mind. Do you can keep update your post. I wanna back. bye!

    Reply
  35. Natural Garcinia Cambogia says

    March 29, 2014 at 5:32 am

    Natural Garcinia Cambogia

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in USA

    Reply
  36. bfddgj says

    April 6, 2014 at 4:16 pm

    bfddgj

    crImmigration.com: NY app ct: Padilla prejudice inquiry considers defendant’s desire to remain in USA

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Pelosi attacker reportedly Canadian overstayer
  • Biden marijuana pardon meets immigration law & fizzles
  • California private prison ban is illegal, 9th Circuit says
  • Citizenship is complicated
  • Supreme Court says Biden can end MPP
  • Uvalde massacre & immigration law aid

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.