crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

By Guest Blogger Linus Chan (Staff Attorney, DePaul University Asylum and Immigration Law Clinic)

In deciding Matter of Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. 850 (BIA July 18, 2012), the BIA answered three important questions of crimmigration law: when is a conviction “criminal”, what is meant by “state law”, and finally, how should immigration courts apply the categorical approach to decide whether someone with two marijuana possession convictions could qualify as a “drug trafficker”?

The year 2008 was not a good one for Cuellar-Gomez.  In January, he was charged and found guilty in Wichita Municipal Court for violating a municipal ordinance forbidding the possession of marijuana.[1] In September he was convicted of possessing marijuana again, but this time he was charged under a state statute, KS § 65-4162, and found guilty by a Kansas district court.  Based on his prior municipal violation, the Kansas state court used KS 65-4162(b)[2] to sentence the Respondent as a “drug severity level 4” felon.

What effect did the municipal violation and conviction have on his immigration status? Was the violation a “conviction” under immigration law? While Congress defined conviction in INA § 101(a)(48), the BIA in Matter of Eslamizar, 23 I&N Dec. 684 (BIA 2004), added an important restriction: “conviction” meant criminal conviction and in order for a conviction to be criminal certain constitutional procedural protections had to have been in place.[3]

Wichita proceedings do not provide appointed counsel, or the right to demand a jury in every case. But because not all criminal proceedings require either a jury or appointed counsel, the only relevant factor to the BIA was the standard of proof. Because the Wichita proceedings required  “proof beyond a reasonable doubt,”[4] any conviction that resulted from a Wichita Municipal Court proceeding was criminal in nature and met the definition of “conviction” under the INA, the BIA concluded. Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. at 855.

Even if a violation of the Wichita Municipal Code was a conviction, the BIA had to decide if it also was a violation of a “law or regulation” of a “State” as required under INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i), the controlled substances offense ground of removal. The BIA gave a discourse on federalism and explained that because all municipalities derive their legal authority from the state in which they reside, when Congress wrote “laws or regulation of a State” it meant to encompass the laws of any political subdivision of a State.

Because the City of Wichita could only pass municipal codes based on its authority from the state of Kansas, any violation of the Wichita Municipal Code should be considered a violation of Kansas law for purposes of the INA.[5] The failure of Congress to explicitly include “municipal” or “local” in the definition, despite using such terminology in other parts of the statute failed to convince the BIA that the omissions were deliberate. Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. at 858-59.

After finding removability under INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i), the BIA next decided whether the Respondent’s state conviction made him a drug trafficker and qualified him as an aggravated felon. Citing to the Supreme Court’s decision in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 130 S.Ct. 2577 (2010), the BIA framed the question as whether or not Cuellar-Gomez was charged and prosecuted for committing recidivist possession.

The BIA focused on two important facts: that the Respondent’s September 2008 indictment explicitly mentioned his prior municipal violation conviction, and that he was sentenced as a “drug severity level 4” felon which required proving that he has a final prior violation of an ordinance forbidding marijuana possession. Because the Respondent had been indicted and prosecuted for “recidivist” possession, according to the BIA he was a drug trafficker and an aggravated felon. Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. at 861-62.

Those of you who may be unfamiliar with aggravated felony definitions may be wondering how someone who has had more than one possession of controlled substances convictions can qualify as a drug trafficker.[6]  The answer lies in INA § 101(a)(43)(B), which defines drug trafficking as any crime punishable as a felony under the Controlled Substances Act.

Because a federal conviction for recidivist possession in certain circumstances can carry a sentence of more than one year it can qualify as a “felony” under the CSA. Prosecution for recidivist possession has two requirements: first certain procedural safeguards have to be met, and second, the prior qualifying conviction must be an offense that was “chargeable under the law of any State.” 21 U.S.C. § 844(a).

The BIA first noted that Kansas provided Cuellar-Gomez with functionally equivalent procedural protections as the federal law, by, for example providing him with notice in the Complaint of the prosecutor’s intent to seek recidivist enhancement.  Furthermore, under Kansas statute, KS § 21-4715, a defendant has the right to require the prosecution to prove the validity of a past conviction to a sentencing judge.  Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. at 863.  Despite describing the Kansas procedures as “not as elaborate” as those required under federal law, they were sufficient as the procedural requirements are not “elements.”  Id.

The Board then moved on to the second requirement of 844(a): whether Cuellar-Gomez’s city ordinance conviction was an offense “chargeable under the law of any State.” Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. at 863. Instead of rehashing the federalism argument from the INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i) section and deciding that municipal violations are state convictions under 21 USC § 844(a), the BIA assumed that municipal violations were not state convictions and instead focused on the term “chargeable.” The Board concluded that the January 2008 municipal violation could have been charged under Kansas law, therefore the subsequent conviction in Kansas state court met the requirements for conviction under 21 USC § 844(a) and consequently a drug trafficking felony by way of recidivist possession. Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. at 864-65.

This final leap is extraordinary for two reasons. First, the BIA never compared the language of the Kansas statute, KS 65-4162(b), with the language of 21 USC § 844(a) as the categorical approach would require. Instead, it compared “elements” without reference to the specific statutory language.

Second, the BIA focused on whether the Respondent could have been found guilty under 21 USC § 844(a) as a recidivist possessor if he was in federal court. The Board’s justification for a hypothetical approach was the word “chargeable”—a word that only exists in § 844(a), the statute that the Respondent was never convicted under!  The BIA concluded that because it was only relying on facts “proven beyond a reasonable doubt” under the state proceedings, the hypothetical approach was justified. Cuellar-Gomez, 25 I&N Dec. at 865.

When looking at aggravated felonies, the inquiry normally starts with the categorical approach which mandates a comparison of the state statute and the federal definition. The statutory language is the starting point because the inquiry should not be whether the Respondent could have been convicted under the federal definition, but rather whether the state court conviction met the requirements mandated by the federal definition in the INA.

Kansas recidivist possession requires that the prior conviction be: “a conviction for a substantially similar offense from another jurisdiction or a conviction of a violation of an ordinance of any city … for a substantially similar offense.” KS § 65-4162(b). Kansas explicitly listed out municipal violations, while 21 USC § 844(a) does not. While it is possible that § 844(a)’s “law of any state” phrase encompasses ordinance violations, the BIA assumed the opposite, and a quick survey of case law finds no precedent on point.

Assuming that 21 USC § 844(a) cannot be used to prosecute someone in federal court for recidivist possession when the prior conviction was a stand-alone ordinance violation, then it doesn’t matter if the facts supporting Cuellar-Gomez’s conviction in Kansas could have led a federal prosecutor in federal court to successfully argue that the ordinance violation was also “chargeable under state law”.

The language of KS 65-4162(b) is what Cuellar-Gomez was convicted of possession of marijuana after having been convicted of a violation of an ordinance of any city for possession of marijuana. The elements of the conviction are spelled out: (1) marijuana, (2) possession, and (3) prior violation of city ordinance forbidding possession of marijuana.  The federal requirements as defined by 21 USC § 844(a): (1) marijuana, (2) possession, and (3) prior conviction that was “chargeable under state law.”

If we assume that “state law” is not by definitionmet by an ordinance violation, as the BIA did, then a conviction under Kansas law is not a conviction for recidivist possession as the third element is different in each statute. It doesn’t matter that Cuellar-Gomez’s ordinance violation happens to be “chargeable” under state law, and therefore a federal prosecutor could have met the third element of 21 § USC 844(a).

The Kansas state prosecutor in his actual prosecution did not have to prove that the ordinance violation was “chargeable” under state law; he just had to prove it was a violation of a city ordinance. If § 844(a) would not allow for prosecution for an ordinance violation standing on its own—as the BIA assumes—then the Respondent was not convicted of recidivist possession as defined by the INA statute and should not have been removed as an aggravated felon and drug trafficker.

Linus Chan is a Staff Attorney at DePaul University’s Asylum and Immigration Law Clinic as part of the Legal Assistance Program, a program designed to help community-based immigration services organizations. He also currently teaches two clinical courses on immigration, including a detention clinic representing individuals facing removal while detained by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, and Criminal Procedure. Attorney Chan has been an active member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and has spoken at a variety of functions and conferences since 2004. He has been practicing immigration law full time since 2004. Prior to joining DePaul, Linus worked at the National Immigrant Justice Center as the Senior Staff Attorney at NIJC’s Detention Project where he represented individuals held in custody by ICE. He has provided trainings to various county public defenders on the immigration consequences of criminal violations.

 

[1] The BIA did not include any of the language from any of the statutes or ordinance used in its opinion.  The current Wichita ordinance is provided here 5.26.010:  “Except as authorized by the Uniform Controlled Substances Act…, it shall be unlawful for any person to possess or have under such person’s control any hallucinogenic drug … Such drugs include, but are not limited to cannabis sativa L.,otherwise known as marihuana…”

[2] “(b) Except as otherwise provided, any person who violates this subsection shall be guilty of a class A nonperson misdemeanor. If any person has a prior conviction under this section, a conviction for a substantially similar offense from another jurisdiction or a conviction of a violation of an ordinance of any city or resolution of any county for a substantially similar….” KS 65-4162(b)(since repealed).

[3]An observant reader may wonder why the BIA bothered to examine the effect of the municipal violation when the Respondent had been convicted in state court under a state statute in September of 2008.  In a footnote, the BIA explains that because the September state conviction lacked any information on the amount of marijuana involved, there was the possibility that the amount involved may have been under 30 grams which invoke the exception under INA 237(a)(2)(B)(i) and render the conviction no longer a removable offense.  The BIA and the IJ could sidestep the exception if they found the Municipal violation triggered removability because the exception only covers a “single violation”.

[4] The BIA in Matter of Eslamizar, 23 I&N Dec 684 (BIA 2004) had left the possibility open that a foreign conviction that did not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt might satisfy the INA definition.

[5]The BIA did reserve for another time the possibility of city passing a law that did not have a companion or parallel version under state law and whether a conviction of such an ordinance would also qualify as a violation of a “law of the State”.

[6] The Supreme Court wondered the same thing in Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47, 55 n.6 (2006), but acknowledged that Congress could define words any way it likes, even if it no longer fits the definition Congress provides.

 

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on July 31, 2012 on 9:00 am 117 Comments
Filed Under: aggravated felony, Board of Immigration Appeals, guest blogger, illicit trafficking

Comments

  1. best hosting says

    October 13, 2012 at 10:53 pm

    best hosting

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  2. Eman pahlavani says

    December 12, 2012 at 9:19 pm

    It is not the matter of two marijuana joints or a truck full of it if a person is found guilty he should face the penalty for his crime Gomez should have consult Good lawyer“>http://www.wmanlawgroup.com“>lawyer for presenting his case in front of judge.

    Reply
  3. Rubby says

    March 15, 2013 at 2:49 am

    Rubby

    It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to this fantastic blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

    Reply
  4. Estella Thall says

    April 29, 2013 at 12:51 am

    Estella Thall

    […]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, they are definitely worth checking out[…]

    Reply
  5. payday loans says

    May 9, 2013 at 12:26 am

    payday loans

    All materials copied from one more supply

    Reply
  6. Phentermine sale says

    May 12, 2013 at 12:40 am

    Phentermine 37.5

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  7. credit consolidation says

    May 12, 2013 at 12:51 am

    credit consolidation loans

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  8. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/greg-dash/5b/390/697 says

    May 12, 2013 at 1:03 am

    Baltimore SEO Company

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  9. web design says

    May 12, 2013 at 1:04 am

    web design essex

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  10. hgh zma side effects says

    May 12, 2013 at 1:08 am

    hgh jesus

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  11. car valuation redbook says

    May 12, 2013 at 1:24 am

    car valuation online australia

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  12. electronic cigarette side effects says

    May 12, 2013 at 1:38 am

    electronic cigarette reviews

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  13. car valuation south africa says

    May 12, 2013 at 1:49 am

    car valuation new zealand free

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  14. Reverse Number Lookup says

    May 12, 2013 at 1:49 am

    Reverse Phone Number Lookup

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  15. donald bernard artist says

    May 12, 2013 at 2:21 am

    Donald Bernard

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  16. free mobile bingo says

    May 12, 2013 at 3:16 am

    bingo the musical

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  17. hgh booster says

    May 12, 2013 at 3:35 am

    hgh grow taller

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  18. low testosterone or depression says

    May 12, 2013 at 3:43 am

    low testosterone and sleep

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  19. Donald Ray Bernard says

    May 12, 2013 at 3:53 am

    donald bernard houston

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  20. electronic cigarette groupon says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:03 am

    electronic cigarette association

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  21. Phentermine says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:09 am

    phentermine knoxville tn

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  22. http://www.aboutecigarette.com says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    electronic cigarettes

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  23. car valuation vic says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:24 am

    car valuation letter

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  24. http://buy7keto.webs.com says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:40 am

    7 keto dhea dosage

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  25. http://www.hghignite.info/ says

    May 12, 2013 at 4:41 am

    http://www.hghignite.info/

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  26. e cig says

    May 12, 2013 at 5:42 am

    electronic cigarette news

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  27. Reverse Phone Number Lookup says

    May 12, 2013 at 5:52 am

    Reverse Phone Number Lookup

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  28. how to get your ex boyfriend back says

    May 12, 2013 at 5:56 am

    how to get your ex boyfriend back

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  29. garcinia says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:01 am

    garcinia extract

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  30. electronic cigarette says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:15 am

    electronic cigarettes

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  31. garcinia ambrosia says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:17 am

    garcinia

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  32. 7 keto young people says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:25 am

    7 keto cvs

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  33. cheapest car insurance says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:38 am

    car insurance quotes pa

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  34. Reverse Phone Number Lookup says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:39 am

    Reverse Phone Lookup

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  35. wedding photographers San Diego says

    May 12, 2013 at 6:48 am

    wedding photographer rochester ny

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  36. human growth hormone says

    May 12, 2013 at 7:39 am

    hgh

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  37. auto insurance quotes says

    May 12, 2013 at 7:49 am

    car insurance quotes

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  38. how to get your ex back in middle school says

    May 12, 2013 at 8:02 am

    http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/wrelationshipcom-tells-visitors-how-to-get-their-ex-back-using-the-no-contact-rule-247419.htm

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  39. e cig says

    May 12, 2013 at 8:47 am

    electronic cigarette

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  40. Reverse Number Lookup says

    May 12, 2013 at 9:15 am

    Reverse Phone Number Lookup

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  41. garcinia yellow mangosteen says

    May 12, 2013 at 10:12 am

    garcinia cambogia

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  42. longchamp outlet online says

    May 13, 2013 at 11:06 am

    longchamp outlet online

    Aw, this was a very nice post. In thought I would like to put in writing like this moreover ?taking time and precise effort to make a very good article?but what can I say?I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.

    Reply
  43. http://buyprovigil.webs.com says

    May 14, 2013 at 4:38 am

    provigil generic price

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  44. garcinia walmart says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:06 am

    garcinia

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  45. buy modafinil says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:14 am

    modafinil xanax

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  46. london escorts says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:30 am

    london escorts

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  47. buy modafinil australia says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:32 am

    modafinil for adhd

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  48. modafinil yahoo answers says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:50 am

    buy modafinil australia online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  49. http://lifelockpromocode.webs.com says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:53 am

    lifelock promotion code

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  50. buy modafinil in australia online says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:53 am

    modafinil quick delivery

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  51. garcinia y faseolamina says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:56 am

    garcinia extract

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  52. e cigarette coupons says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:57 am

    best electronic cigarette

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  53. where to buy electronic cigarettes says

    May 14, 2013 at 5:57 am

    where to buy electronic cigarettes

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  54. modafinil schedule says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:05 am

    modafinil kidney

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  55. modafinil illegal says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:14 am

    buy modafinil australia online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  56. volcano vaporizer says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:21 am

    vaporizer questions

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  57. christmas xmas says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:27 am

    christmas board game

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  58. best electronic cigarette says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:28 am

    electronic cigarette coupons

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  59. volcano vaporizer says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:29 am

    volcano vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  60. christmas board game says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:32 am

    christmas nascar pit crew

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  61. tramadol online says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:35 am

    http://archive.org/details/buytramadol50mgonline

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  62. Anonymous says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:39 am

    london escorts

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  63. cialis blood pressure says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:40 am

    cialis

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  64. modafinil says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:43 am

    modafinil

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  65. vaporizer mods says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:44 am

    vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  66. lifelock promo code says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:53 am

    lifelock promo code

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  67. buy provigil says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:57 am

    provigil

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  68. christmas board game says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:58 am

    christmas zombie games

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  69. modafinil generic price says

    May 14, 2013 at 6:59 am

    modafinil japan

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  70. escorts london says

    May 14, 2013 at 7:01 am

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  71. board games says

    May 14, 2013 at 7:10 am

    christmas kiss

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  72. electronic cigarettes vaping says

    May 14, 2013 at 7:12 am

    electronic cigarettes v2

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  73. christmas board game says

    May 14, 2013 at 7:21 am

    board games

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  74. tramadol online says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:06 pm

    buy tramadol

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  75. buy provigil says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:13 pm

    buy provigil online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  76. vaporizer yahoo answers says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:19 pm

    vaporizer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  77. http://cialis-italia.com says

    May 15, 2013 at 11:54 pm

    cialis versus viagra

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  78. cialis says

    May 16, 2013 at 12:27 am

    cialis

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  79. http://buyprovigil.webs.com says

    May 16, 2013 at 12:32 am

    provigil

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  80. cialis says

    May 16, 2013 at 1:07 am

    acquisto cialis

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  81. 7 keto energy says

    May 17, 2013 at 4:33 am

    7 keto

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  82. DS Craze says

    May 17, 2013 at 4:39 am

    Driven Sports Craze Review

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  83. payday loans for bad credit says

    May 17, 2013 at 5:26 am

    pay day loans

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  84. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThLQ3aL_I7A says

    May 17, 2013 at 6:26 am

    driven sports craze online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  85. don varden says

    May 17, 2013 at 6:58 am

    don varden

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  86. lunette super retro future says

    May 17, 2013 at 7:09 am

    ray ban blue mirror

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  87. http://marketingheaven.net/buy-facebook-fans/ says

    May 18, 2013 at 1:31 pm

    buy facebook likes

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  88. twitter followers says

    May 18, 2013 at 2:17 pm

    buy twitter hack

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  89. donald ray bernard says

    May 18, 2013 at 2:25 pm

    financial experts women

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  90. phentermine yellow says

    May 18, 2013 at 2:30 pm

    phentermine price

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  91. mark ward kia says

    May 18, 2013 at 2:43 pm

    mark ward kia carbondale illinois

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  92. lifelock promotional code says

    May 18, 2013 at 2:46 pm

    lifelock promo

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  93. louis vuitton onlin says

    May 18, 2013 at 2:54 pm

    louis vuitton onlin

    I discovered your weblog website on google and check a few of your early posts. Proceed to keep up the very good operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Searching for forward to reading extra from you in a while!?

    Reply
  94. site says

    May 18, 2013 at 2:54 pm

    site

    I together with my friends have been studying the great key points found on the blog then then developed a terrible suspicion I never thanked the web site owner for those tips. All the young men came so joyful to learn all of them and already have in reality been using them. I appreciate you for truly being so kind and then for having this sort of outstanding ideas most people are really eager to be informed on. My personal sincere apologies for not expressing gratitude to sooner.

    Reply
  95. green coffee and weight loss says

    May 18, 2013 at 3:05 pm

    green coffee extract

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  96. facebook fans.it says

    May 18, 2013 at 3:19 pm

    buy facebook fans

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  97. modafinil x ritalina says

    May 18, 2013 at 3:44 pm

    buy modafinil in australia online

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidiv

    Reply
  98. Cheap Fitflops says

    May 26, 2013 at 4:59 am

    Cheap Fitflops

    I think the admin of this web page is really working hard for his website, as here every information is quality based information.

    Reply
  99. FAKE Oakley HOlbrook says

    May 28, 2013 at 4:48 pm

    FAKE Oakley HOlbrook

    If you sayI do not care to set eyes on this article, the next time I am followed about your article, I think I will never again careless. Do you believe in yourself, you do not know your article can make people so infatuated with.

    Reply
  100. gaiss says

    June 24, 2013 at 4:54 am

    gaiss

    louis vuitton i was helped right away

    Reply
  101. rayban says

    June 25, 2013 at 9:26 pm

    rayban

    Aw, this was a very nice post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this moreover ?taking time and precise effort to make an excellent article?however what can I say?I procrastinate alot and certainly not appear to get something done.

    Reply
  102. Oakley Mens Sunglasses says

    July 11, 2013 at 1:52 pm

    Oakley Mens Sunglasses

    Because the YouTube video clips are posted at this place same like I also embed YouTube video code at my own web page, since it is trouble-free to take embedded code.

    Reply
  103. Oakley Juliet says

    July 13, 2013 at 3:20 am

    Oakley Juliet

    If some one wants expert view on the topic of blogging afterward i propose him/her to pay a visit this web site, Keep up the fastidious job.

    Reply
  104. Fake Oakley Mens says

    July 14, 2013 at 8:05 am

    Fake Oakley Mens

    Highly descriptive blog, I loved that a lot. Will there be a part 2?

    Reply
  105. Cheap Oakley Rada says

    July 21, 2013 at 7:28 am

    Cheap Oakley Rada

    It an remarkable piece of writing designed for all the internet visitors; they will obtain advantage from it I am sure.

    Reply
  106. Cheap Oakley Radarlock says

    July 21, 2013 at 3:11 pm

    Cheap Oakley Radarlock

    What’s up, is it rite to only study from textbooks not to visit internet for latest updates, what you say guys?

    Reply
  107. Cheap Oakley Frogskins says

    July 23, 2013 at 1:35 am

    Cheap Oakley Frogskins

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  108. Sac Longchamp pas cher says

    July 25, 2013 at 7:01 pm

    Sac Longchamp pas cher

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  109. Sac Longchamp Pas Cher says

    July 26, 2013 at 6:41 am

    Sac Longchamp Pas Cher

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  110. Cheap Oakley Deringer says

    July 28, 2013 at 7:42 am

    Cheap Oakley Deringer

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  111. Cheap Oakley Blender says

    July 30, 2013 at 5:57 pm

    Cheap Oakley Blender

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  112. fake Oakley Big Taco says

    July 30, 2013 at 9:18 pm

    fake Oakley Big Taco

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  113. Longchamp pas cher says

    July 31, 2013 at 10:11 pm

    Longchamp pas cher

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply
  114. itomon blog says

    August 2, 2013 at 12:59 pm

    itomon blog

    I am John, how are you everybody? This paragraph posted at this site is actually pleasant.

    Reply
  115. lucky blog says

    August 3, 2013 at 11:28 pm

    lucky blog

    This piece of writing will assist the internet people for setting up new blog or even a weblog from start to end.

    Reply
  116. Parajumpers jakker says

    December 20, 2013 at 2:18 am

    Parajumpers jakker

    http://www.natwestconstructions.com/trash/index.asp Torrey Smith Ravens Jersey http://www.stridesarco.com/oldsite/index.asp Salomon trail running Shoes http://www.bagnobruno.it/spiag.asp Pat Angerer jersey 3xl green http://www.mvgschools.com/aug.php Torrey Smith Ravens Jersey

    Reply
  117. garcinia cambogia extract says

    March 31, 2014 at 1:01 am

    garcinia cambogia extract

    crImmigration.com: BIA: City drug ordinance violation is a state law conviction; counts for recidivist offender purposes

    Reply

Leave a Reply to christmas board game Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court says gap in conviction records hurts migrant
  • Abolish ICE
  • Federal court enjoins 100-day deportation pause
  • ICE issues enforcement priorities
  • Immigration possibilities & challenges
  • Criminal bars, policing changes, & meaningful reforms in proposed legislation

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.