crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

Archive

After regularly updating crimmigration.com from January 2009 until November 2022, I have stopped doing so. I hope you continue to benefit from the blog as an archive. For up-to-date information about my work, visit ccgarciahernandez.com. – César

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

Scholars Sidebar: Can immigration attorney be appointed in fed criminal case?

A new article by a Justice Department trial attorney suggests that it may be possible for immigration counsel to be appointed in the federal prosecution of a noncitizen defendant. Scott R. Grubman, I Want My (Immigration) Lawyer! The Necessity of Court-Appointed Immigration Counsel in Criminal Prosecutions After Padilla v. Kentucky, 12 Nev. L. J. 364 (2012). Grubman clearly explains that the views expressed in the article are his alone and not those of the Justice Department.

According to Grubman, the federal Criminal Justice Act may provide a route for a criminal defense attorney to request appointment of counsel with special knowledge of immigration law. Better known as the federal statute governing appointment of criminal defense counsel to indigent defendants facing federal charges, the CJA allows indigent defendants to request “services [that] are necessary and that the person is financially unable to obtain.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(1).

Is immigration law expertise one of these “services”? Grubman argues that it is. Grubman at 388. For support he points to a Massachusetts federal district court decision, United States v. Alves, 317 F. Supp. 2d 65 (D. Mass. 2004), that “interpreted the CJA as possibly requiring funding for the services of an immigration attorney in certain circumstances.” Grubman at 386.

If the immigration questions are “extremely difficult,” appointment may be permissible, the court explained. By “extremely difficult” the court seems to mean that the immigration law implication is beyond the wherewithal of a reasonable attorney’s research abilities. Grubman at 387 n.244. “If,” the Alves court wrote, “CJA counsel has a defendant where it cannot be discerned, despite CJA counsel’s diligent research efforts, what effect a conviction will have on the defendant’s immigration status, then a case can be made that prior authorization to obtain assistance from an immigration attorney should be granted.” Grubman at 387 n.244 (quoting Alves, 317 F. Supp. 2d at 67-68). It’s worth noting that the court declined to appoint immigration counsel. Grubman at 387.

I haven’t heard of too many people trying to use the CJA in this way. Given that Grubman identifies a case where the court did not appoint immigration counsel and none where the court did appoint immigration counsel, I’m assuming he wasn’t able to find any stronger support. The only other case I’ve seen along these lines is an unpublished Southern District of Texas order denying a request to appoint counsel to make a Padilla-based ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a state court. United States v. García, 2011 WL 2313212 (S.D. Tex. 2011) (Kazen, J.). Clearly García presents a very different situation than what Grubman suggests. It’s an interesting proposition and I would love to hear from anyone who has had any experience trying to use the CJA how Grubman suggests.

 

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on September 13, 2012 on 9:00 am 6 Comments
Filed Under: commentaries, Scholars Sidebar, U.S. District Courts

Comments

  1. Patty Corrales says

    September 14, 2012 at 6:08 am

    Cesar-

    I totally agree with this perspective. Interestingly enough when I was an ICE Senior Attorney, I handled a complicated civil denaturalization case. In that case, the Federal District Court Judge (Hubbard) appointed private counsel to assist the defendant in the civil proceedings before the Court. The Court found that the loss of US citizenship was akin to the loss of liberty and therefore the need for legal representation was crucial given the complicated immigration laws. An argument can be made equally that immigration counsel should be appointed in criminal cases in addition to the Federal PD. Patty Corrales

    Reply
  2. cheap nfl jerseys says

    November 3, 2012 at 11:51 am

    cheap nfl jerseys

    crImmigration.com: Scholars Sidebar: Can immigration attorney be appointed in fed criminal case?

    Reply
  3. Read Even more says

    April 4, 2013 at 9:25 pm

    Read Even more

    crImmigration.com: Scholars Sidebar: Can immigration attorney be appointed in fed criminal case?

    Reply
  4. gry hazardowe online says

    May 6, 2013 at 3:35 pm

    gry hazardowe online

    Picking Out The Albumgry Online Hazardowe Gry Online Hazardowe Urgry Online Hazardowee

    Reply
  5. ugg outlet says

    December 19, 2013 at 1:19 pm

    ugg outlet

    online ugg boots uk review

    Reply
  6. wchzoh says

    March 6, 2014 at 8:03 pm

    wchzoh

    Agree with your words. Hope you can keep update your post. I want back. thx!

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Pelosi attacker reportedly Canadian overstayer
  • Biden marijuana pardon meets immigration law & fizzles
  • California private prison ban is illegal, 9th Circuit says
  • Citizenship is complicated
  • Supreme Court says Biden can end MPP
  • Uvalde massacre & immigration law aid

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.