crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

Archive

After regularly updating crimmigration.com from January 2009 until November 2022, I have stopped doing so. I hope you continue to benefit from the blog as an archive. For up-to-date information about my work, visit ccgarciahernandez.com. – César

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

2 crImmigration cases at SCOTUS term that starts Monday

Another Supreme Court term begins on Monday and the Court has already agreed to hear arguments in two crImmigration cases: Moncrieffe v. Holder, No. 11-702, and Chaidez v. United States, No. 11-820. The first case once more entangles the Court in the aggravated felony provisions of immigration law, while the second brings the landmark Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), back to the high court.

The first crImmigration case to appear before the justices will be Moncrieffe on October 10. The Court has been asked to decide whether possession with intent to distribute constitutes a drug trafficking type of aggravated felony even where it’s possible that the noncitizen was convicted of possessing such a small amount of marijuana that it would qualify as a misdemeanor under federal law rather than as a felony. (My detailed explanation of what’s at stake in Moncrieffe is available here.)

A few weeks later, on October 30, the Court will turn its attention to Chaidez to explain just how expansively Padilla is to apply. In Padilla, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel requires that criminal defense attorneys advise a noncitizen defendant about the immigration consequences of a conviction. Chaidez presents the Court with the question whether Padilla applies to convictions entered prior to March 31, 2010, the date Padilla was issued. (My earlier analysis of Chaidez is available here.)

Neither of these cases will have the star power of last term’s Arizona v. United States, but both stand to impact large numbers of people. Needless to say, I’ll be following developments in both quite closely.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on September 27, 2012 on 9:00 am 1 Comment
Filed Under: aggravated felony, illicit trafficking, Padilla v. Kentucky, post-conviction relief, right to counsel, U.S. Supreme Court

Comments

  1. http://www.paydayday.co.uk/ says

    January 12, 2013 at 11:32 pm

    http://www.paydayday.co.uk/

    crImmigration.com: 2 crImmigration cases at SCOTUS term that starts Monday

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Pelosi attacker reportedly Canadian overstayer
  • Biden marijuana pardon meets immigration law & fizzles
  • California private prison ban is illegal, 9th Circuit says
  • Citizenship is complicated
  • Supreme Court says Biden can end MPP
  • Uvalde massacre & immigration law aid

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.