crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

Symposium: Rejecting the Fifth Circuit’s approach would promote fairness, efficiency, and uniformity

 
 
 
 
 

By Sarah Rose Weinman, Equal
Justice Works Fellow, and Claudia Valenzuela, Associate Director of Litigation,
National Immigrant Justice Center, Chicago

 

This Wednesday, October 10, the
U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Moncrieffe v. Holder, an immigration case arising out of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Moncrieffe presents
yet another challenge by an immigrant to the charge that his conviction
constitutes an “aggravated felony” in the immigration context—a determination
that generally results in permanent banishment from the United States.

 

In Moncrieffe, a lawful permanent resident was convicted of a state
offense that criminalized selling or transferring marijuana, and received a
sentence of probation. Under federal law, a drug trafficking offense is
considered an aggravated felony, yet a misdemeanor exception exists for
transferring a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration. 21 U.S.C. §841(b)(4).

 

The state statute under which
Moncrieffe was convicted criminalizes both conduct that would constitute an
aggravated felony (sale of marijuana) and
conduct that would not (transferring a small amount of marijuana for no
remuneration), and the record of conviction did not show that Moncrieffe’s
conduct would bring it within the ambit of misdemeanor exception.

 

The Fifth Circuit held that where
a state statute covers both aggravated felony and marijuana misdemeanor conduct
and where the record of conviction is unclear as to what type of conduct was
involved, the offense presumptively should be considered an aggravated felony. In
so holding, the court of appeals effectively set aside the longstanding
categorical/modified categorical approach to determining if an offense is an
aggravated felony. Typically, if the record of conviction does not definitively
show that the conduct involved constitutes an aggravated felony, then the
government cannot meets its burden of proving that a lawfully admitted
immigrant is removable as an aggravated felon.

 

Yet, the rule adopted by the Fifth
Circuit (and by the Board of Immigration Appeals) does away with this approach:
where the record of conviction does not clearly prove an aggravated felony, the
Fifth Circuit’s rule would require that an immigrant disprove his own removability by essentially re-litigating his
criminal case in removal proceedings and gathering evidence (possibly from a
decades-old offense) to show that his state marijuana conviction is not an aggravated felony.

 

As amici, the National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) and fellow organizations that provide direct legal
services to detained immigrants support the Petitioner’s position urging the
Court to reject the Fifth Circuit’s rule and to uphold the traditional categorical/modified
categorical approach. The amicus brief sheds light on the practical difficulties
that the Fifth Circuit’s position would raise.

 

Immigrants face extraordinary
barriers in litigating their own removal proceedings. There is no right to
appointed counsel for indigent individuals in immigration proceedings, so a
majority of immigrants (many of whom do not speak English and have limited
education) appear pro se. Defending
against removal can be procedurally and substantively complicated even for
experienced attorneys. Further, if an immigrant faces removal for even a minor
drug-related offense, he is subject to mandatory detention. There is no
possibility for bond, even if the individual is not a flight risk or a danger
to the community, and even if he may have a defense to his deportation.

 

Being detained makes it difficult
for immigrants to defend against their removal, particularly if they are pro se. Immigrants in detention often
are held in remote facilities, are transferred between facilities frequently
and without notice, and have irregular access to phones; this detention context
makes it difficult if not impossible to contact family, friends, courts, former
public defenders, or anyone else who might help them gather documents or other
evidence they would need to mount a defense to deportation.

 

In addition to the serious
fairness concerns that would arise by requiring a legal permanent resident or
other lawfully admitted immigrant to disprove his own removability, any such
rule would cause massive delays and
inefficiencies in an already backlogged immigration court system. The system
prioritizes rapid adjudication of cases, particularly for detained noncitizens,
and immigration judges face pressure to resolve their overcrowded dockets
quickly but fairly.

 

Yet, the practical difficulties
that would arise by requiring detained, pro
se
immigrants to collect old records showing that an offense involved only
a small amount of marijuana and that they did not receive any money in
transferring it would require judges to make an untenable choice: either
grant a series of continuances to permit immigrants time to gather evidence in
their defense, thus adding to docket backlogs, or deny requests for continuances
and risk permanently exiling someone who may well not be removable under the
law but simply can’t prove it in time.

 

Amici’s goal in
presenting a picture to the Court of the procedural hurdles facing detained
immigrants in removal proceedings was to show why the strict application of the
categorical rule is warranted by the need to make removal proceedings fair, uniform,
and efficient.

Claudia, Sarah, and other NIJC staff regularly discuss NIJC’s immigrants’ rights litigation at the NIJC Federal Litigation blog and about the human impact of immigration detention the These Lives Matter blog.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on October 9, 2012 on 9:01 am 15 Comments
Filed Under: aggravated felony, guest blogger, illicit trafficking, Scholars Sidebar, Symposium, U.S. Supreme Court

Comments

  1. http://www.paydayday.co.uk/ says

    January 12, 2013 at 11:43 pm

    http://www.paydayday.co.uk/

    crImmigration.com: Symposium: Rejecting the Fifth Circuit’s approach would promote fairness, efficiency, and uniformity

    Reply
  2. air max france says

    May 8, 2013 at 5:45 pm

    air max france

    Air Jordan XX3 23 is the last The Jordan 23. Nike Air Jordan XXIII (23) Jordan Brand Classic Bred ,Air Jordan 23 Original Release Air Jordan XX3 (23) Premier White / Titanium

    Reply
  3. Cheap Oakley Sunglasses says

    May 12, 2013 at 12:36 am

    Cheap Oakley Sunglasses

    Have a fantastic day!I’m very happy when see your post.I quite approve of your standpoint.I will continue to focus on your blog.I believe that the future I will see more about your ingenious views.

    Reply
  4. Nike Free 5.0 says

    May 18, 2013 at 7:45 am

    Nike Free 5.0

    Thank wonderful article! I really enjoy reading it, you can be a great author. I will make sure you bookmark my blog, from now on, will eventually come. I want to encourage you to continue the great work, have a good weekend!i Will used it again.

    Reply
  5. キーホルダー says

    May 30, 2013 at 4:48 am

    キーホルダー

    crImmigration.com: Symposium: Rejecting the Fifth Circuit’s approach would promote fairness, efficiency, and uniformity

    Reply
  6. cheap louis vuitton for sale says

    June 10, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    cheap louis vuitton for sale

    Your article crImmigration.com: Symposium: Rejecting the Fifth Circuit’s approach would promote fairness, efficiency, and uniformity write very well, thank you share!

    Reply
  7. 腕時計 メンズ says

    June 16, 2013 at 6:59 am

    腕時計 メンズ

    crImmigration.com: Symposium: Rejecting the Fifth Circuit’s approach would promote fairness, efficiency, and uniformity

    Reply
  8. Oakley Holbrook says

    June 27, 2013 at 3:38 am

    Oakley Holbrook

    I have study much on the topic of without charge blogging blogs, however I have no clear idea regarding that, can any one let know me which one is finest in support of free blogging?

    Reply
  9. ray ban says

    July 12, 2013 at 10:51 pm

    ray ban

    Nice, swift piece that carries ita??s personal temper about with it. That is excellent. Dropping Chandler like that and not pursuing up? Not so excellent. Helps make folks consider about art and the true life mirrored there

    Reply
  10. cheap oakleys says

    July 14, 2013 at 3:50 am

    cheap oakleys

    I抦 gone to tell my little brother, that he should also pay a visit this webpage on regular basis to obtain updated from newest news update.

    Reply
  11. Cheap Oakley Radarlock Sunglasses says

    July 18, 2013 at 4:46 am

    Cheap Oakley Radarlock Sunglasses

    Really programming is nothing but it a logic, if you obtain handle on it after that you are the master else nothing.

    Reply
  12. fake oakleys says

    July 22, 2013 at 4:02 am

    fake oakleys

    Wow, this article is fastidious, my sister is analyzing these kinds of things, therefore I am going to tell her.

    Reply
  13. Fake Oakleys says

    July 25, 2013 at 5:21 am

    Fake Oakleys

    crImmigration.com: Symposium: Rejecting the Fifth Circuit’s approach would promote fairness, efficiency, and uniformity

    Reply
  14. lucky blog says

    August 3, 2013 at 12:25 pm

    lucky blog

    Can you please send an e-mail to me the code for this script or please let know me in detail in relation to this script?

    Reply
  15. chaussures de foot nike says

    April 12, 2014 at 1:56 pm

    chaussures de foot nike

    At this time it seems like Expression Engine is the top blogging platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to キーホルダー Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court says gap in conviction records hurts migrant
  • Abolish ICE
  • Federal court enjoins 100-day deportation pause
  • ICE issues enforcement priorities
  • Immigration possibilities & challenges
  • Criminal bars, policing changes, & meaningful reforms in proposed legislation

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.