crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril


The Migrants’ Rights Network, a London-based advocacy organization, asked me to share my thoughts on the prospects for immigration law reform in light of last week’s elections. This is a follow-up to a pre-election essay I wrote for MRN.


Last week’s presidential election in the United States shifted our understanding of the nation’s electoral map. The burgeoning Latino population, driven by immigration and birth, which has been affecting election outcomes at the municipal and state level for years, finally tilted the presidential race. In a coalition of unprecedented strength, Latinos overwhelmingly joined forces with other communities of color—principally African Americans and Asian Americans—plus labor unions and liberal white voters to propel President Barack Obama to a second term and keep the Senate in Democratic hands. Having received the support of more than 70 percent of Latino voters, President Obama’s comment during the last weeks of the campaign that his reelection would come courtesy of Republican alienation of Latinos was nothing short of prescient.


The critical question now becomes whether President Obama and his Democratic colleagues will use their agenda-setting power to keep this important voting block in its wing or whether Republicans, newly chastised for vilifying immigrants, will alter their course to embrace a growing constituency that values immigrants and is willing to take to the polls to show their distaste for politicians who don’t. Leaders of the two major parties have indicated a newfound willingness to tackle this topic despite repeated failed attempts going back to the days just before September 11, 2001 when then-President George W. Bush and the Mexican president at the time Vicente Fox seemed on the verge of an agreement. Within days of this month’s election, Charles Schumer, the influential Democratic senator from New York, and Lindsey Graham, his Republican counterpart from South Carolina, announced their renewed commitment to immigration reform. Meanwhile, John Boehner, the Republican leader in the House of Representatives, reportedly said that comprehensive immigration reform is overdue.


There is plenty of reason for immigration watchers to tread carefully through the political storm that’s already brewing about how to move forward with immigration law reform. The election results may have sent a shockwave through the Republican Party and been cause for celebration in Democratic Party offices, but it hasn’t changed legislators’ rhetorical starting point. The Democratic Schumer and Republicans Boehner and Graham have all repeated the pre-campaign focus on securitization. In particular, on a national television news program, Schumer stressed the need to “close the border.” If these are the words of the Democrats who kept control of the Senate thanks to Latinos who care deeply about enacting humane immigration laws, then the prospects are dim.


Calls such as Schumer’s for greater securitization imply that the border is a chaotic mess. Nothing could be further from the truth. Crime statistics from the nation’s premier law enforcement agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, clearly indicate that some of the nation’s safest metropolitan areas are located along the border with México. My hometown, for example, McAllen, a city of 133,000 residents, saw 246 violent crimes in 2011, while El Paso—its population of 663,000 making it the largest Texas border city—experienced 2,858 violent crimes. Meanwhile, two cities in Ohio, where I work, that have similar numbers of people—Dayton (population 142,0000) and Columbus (population 787,000)—suffered from 1,355 and 5,185 violent crimes, respectively.


All the while, communities along the border have been subjected to an ever-larger presence of myriad security forces. The federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the agency responsible for both repelling terrorists and managing migration, has boosted the number of border guards from 4,139 in fiscal year 1992, to 10,045 in FY 2002, to 21,444 at the end of the 2011 fiscal year. Most of these—approximately 18,000 in FY 2011—are stationed along the U.S. border with México, a prioritization justified by President Bush’s homeland security chief, Asa Hutchinson, who explained that “[t]he best border security on the northern border is the grandmother who has lived in her house on the border for seventy years. She sits in her home and watches the border and calls border patrol when she sees something suspicious” (Asa Hutchinson, Keynote Address, 59 Administrative Law Review 533, 541 (2007)).


While grandmothers stare into Canada, border communities along the southwest have had to accommodate a fixation with steel and concrete fences that have sprung up in recent years at a cost of billions of dollars and with seemingly no regard to the commercial and personal ties that have propelled the region for longer than it has been divided by a political boundary. The 2006 Secure Fence Act demanded that DHS build almost 700 miles of wall, and, while it hasn’t reached that goal, it has erected a fortification never before seen between friendly nations. As the sociologist Robert Lee Maril put it, “Stretching for miles as far as the eye can see in either direction, this completed hydraulic wall appears not only monumental in size, but also impenetrable” (Robert Lee Maril, The Fence 245 (2011)). Another project, an attempt to create a high-tech “virtual” fence, failed due to technological problems, but not before the Boeing Corporation received a $1.1 billion payment.


Though the price tag is high, the cost in human lives is more significant. An estimated 2,466 migrants have died since 2000 as they trekked into the forbidding desert to avoid the vast number of agents and fencing that surround traditional migratory routes, according to the Arizona Recovered Human Remains Project. At the same time, law enforcement officials occasionally mete out misguided justice at the end of a rifle: news reports indicate that in October Texas state police officers mistakenly took Guatemalan immigrants hiding under a blanket in the back of a pickup truck to be a load of drugs. One officer, following departmental policy, opened fire preemptively, presumably in an attempt to deflate a tire. Instead, three immigrants were shot and two died. The truck contained no drugs and no one shot at the officers. All this happened in a region of 1 million people and not too far, police officials said, from three schools.


To claim, then, that the border is not secure, that it is, instead, in need of “closing,” is to seriously misunderstand the border or to privilege securitization over common sense and human dignity. Immigration law reform doesn’t need to wait until the border is secure. The border has been secure for decades. It is just as good a place to live as when I was growing up there, and far safer than metropolitan areas throughout the nation’s interior. The border security clamor, whether from Democrats or Republicans, rings of nothing more than pandering to restrictionists who don’t like the changing face of the United States, but suddenly realize their electoral hopes can’t come to fruition without moderating their tone. To start the newly reinvigorated debate about immigration law reform by implying that the border is not secure is inaccurate and likely to lead to many more billions of dollars thrown into policing Latino communities on the border and elsewhere with the end result being that the record-number of deportations that characterized President Obama’s first term (and about which I wrote in a previous contribution to MRN’s Migration Pulse) will eventually seem tame, countless families will be torn apart, and unknown numbers of lives lost.


[The original version of this essay appeared in MRN’s Migration Pulse blog on November 12, 2012.]

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on November 13, 2012 on 9:00 am 27 Comments
Filed Under: commentaries

Comments

  1. Keith M. Harrison says

    November 13, 2012 at 1:53 pm

    Nice post

    Reply
  2. Karen L Reimer says

    November 14, 2012 at 5:30 pm

    Well spoken on the issues covered. May I add that there is so much more to “immigration reform”. This is a gargantuan human rights issue as it pertains to the United States. Families are torn apart by outdated immigration rules over misdemeanor convictions. It is inhumane the way immigrants are criminalized and used for revenue in many rural county prison systems in the United States. Not all immigrants are from Mexico and Central America. Many from Africa and Eastern Europe are languishing in our prison systems for lack of proper ID as their sole crime. Their bodies represent federal revenue for rural counties, providing jobs for local economies. Then there is the issue of the immigration court system which is highly inefficient and in many cases downright abusive. There is a “good old boy” system underculture as well. I can relate personal story after personal story of human beings and whole families whose lives are ruined permanently by the callous ineffectiveness of our so-called immigration court system. Many people would have been better off had they never come to America. You mention the 2,000 plus deaths of immigrants coming “in” to this country, that is nothing compared to the undocumented number of deaths of those who are deported after 10, 15 years in this country, then sent back to starve and die in countries where they have long since lost all family and friends and ability to survive. Children that came to the US at two years old, sent back to countries where they don’t speak the language in their twenties because of a misdemeanor offense, they don’t know anyone or anything about the country they are “deported” to. I would estimate there are tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of deaths like these. Of course our government does not track this. The average American is extremely naive about the plight of the immigrant therefore they are ill prepared to make appropriate decisions regarding “immigration reform.”

    Reply
  3. Top Criminal Defense Lawyer In Houston says

    November 21, 2012 at 9:44 am

    Top Criminal Defense Lawyer In Houston

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  4. Harris County Sex Crime Attorney says

    December 20, 2012 at 9:57 am

    Harris County Sex Crime Attorney

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  5. Houston Sex Crimes Lawyer says

    December 26, 2012 at 10:40 am

    Houston Sex Crimes Lawyer

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  6. Houston Sex Crime Attorney says

    January 20, 2013 at 12:57 am

    Houston Sex Crime Attorney

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  7. Houston Sex Crime Attorney says

    January 20, 2013 at 12:57 am

    Houston Sex Crime Attorney

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  8. Houston Sexual Assault Attorney says

    February 11, 2013 at 3:40 am

    Houston Sexual Assault Attorney

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  9. CT Fence Company says

    March 3, 2013 at 9:31 am

    CT Fence Company

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  10. cheat black ops 2 says

    March 3, 2013 at 9:37 am

    cheat black ops 2

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  11. Challenge Coins says

    March 3, 2013 at 9:41 am

    Challenge Coins

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  12. cortinadecristal.es says

    March 3, 2013 at 9:50 am

    cortinadecristal.es

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  13. Modded Controllers says

    March 3, 2013 at 9:51 am

    Modded Controllers

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  14. intensive driving derby says

    March 3, 2013 at 9:52 am

    intensive driving derby

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  15. london city hotels says

    March 3, 2013 at 9:55 am

    london city hotels

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  16. gatwick minicab says

    March 3, 2013 at 10:36 am

    gatwick minicab

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  17. Cerramientos sin perfiles says

    March 3, 2013 at 10:42 am

    Cerramientos sin perfiles

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  18. http://chinamotoparts.net/ says

    March 3, 2013 at 10:52 am

    http://chinamotoparts.net/

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  19. intensive driving lessons stoke on trent says

    March 3, 2013 at 11:29 am

    intensive driving lessons stoke on trent

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  20. knoxville consignment says

    April 15, 2013 at 2:30 am

    knoxville consignment

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  21. buy-steroids.ca says

    April 16, 2013 at 4:08 am

    buy-steroids.ca

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  22. http://www.nikeairmax2009.org says

    April 16, 2013 at 7:07 am

    http://www.nikeairmax2009.org

    Then 6 months later came the first additional colour – The Metallic Red Then 6 months later came the first additional colour – The Metallic Red.___Stacy was the APs Tampa, Fla___Stacy was the APs Tampa, Fla. Visit Tom’s blog athttp://www Visit Tom’s blog athttp://www.

    Reply
  23. how to meet friends says

    April 22, 2013 at 3:04 am

    how to meet friends

    crImmigration.com: U.S. Immigration Reform Post-Election: The Prospects and the Peril

    Reply
  24. payday loans says

    April 28, 2013 at 11:26 am

    payday loans

    This is the worst article of all, I’ve study

    Reply
  25. baidu says

    May 13, 2013 at 3:13 am

    baidu

    baidu http://www.baidu.com

    Reply
  26. baidu says

    May 13, 2013 at 3:44 pm

    baidu

    baidu http://www.baidu.com

    Reply
  27. gucci outlet says

    July 16, 2013 at 3:56 am

    gucci outlet

    Go directly to our BTN contact page. We read every piece of mail as fast as we can, so please be as specific as possible and choose the relevant categories.

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Mistakes aren’t reviewable, Supreme Court says
  • ICE prosecutorial discretion guidance
  • Supreme Court again considers ICE’s detention powers
  • Troubled contractor gets $180 million to hold young migrants
  • Chronicling Arizona’s Immigration Politics
  • Tracking ICE Surveillance

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.