crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

CO Supreme Ct: Motion to withdraw available for ineffective assistance claim based on deferred judgment

The Colorado Supreme Court held that noncitizens trying to challenge a deferred judgment based on Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), may do so under the state’s rule for motion to withdraw pleas but they may not seek review of the judgment and sentence because none exists. Kazadi v. People, No. 11SC264, slip op. (Colo. Dec. 20, 2012) (Hobbs, J., writing for the court; Bender, C.J., dissenting).

Deferred judgment, the court explained, essentially holds the criminal proceeding in abeyance. As such, no conviction or sentence is entered. In the court’s words, “a deferred judgment is a continuance of the defendant’s case in lieu of the imposition of sentence, where a sentence may be issued if the defendant fails to abide by prescribed conditions.” Kazadi, No. 11SC264, slip op. at 14. Since no conviction or sentence exists, there can be nothing for a court to review. Kazadi, No. 11SC264, slip op. at 13. Consequently, a motion to review under Colo. Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(c) is improper.

In contrast, the court explained that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea under Colo. Rule of Crim. P. 32(d) is appropriate where a deferred judgment was entered. Kazadi, No. 11SC264, slip op. at 13. Importantly, it explained that an ineffective assistance claim may be brought using a motion to withdraw. Kazadi, No. 11SC264, slip op. at 10.

Given my interests, the complication arises when other jurisdictions get involved—namely, DHS. According to the dissent, “the irreversible effects of some collateral consequences may have already occurred—such as the mandatory deportation to Congo that Kazadi faces here—and may therefore render the benefit of a successfully completed deferred judgment of little or no value to the defendant.” Kazadi, No. 11SC264, slip op. at 18. Colorado’s AILA chapter raised similar concerns in its amicus brief to the court based on the BIA’s position in Matter of Chairez-Castañeda, 21 I&N Dec. 44, 48 (BIA 1995), that adjudications pursuant Colorado’s deferral of judgment statute are convictions for immigration law purposes.

The idea that the dissenter, Chief Justice Bender, is suggesting is that noncitizens will have less reason to seek or accept deferred judgment or, if they do take it, they’ll have less reason to abide by the terms, because they’ll potentially face removal but won’t have the ability to vacate the conviction until they violate the terms of the deferred judgment conviction because it’s only upon violation of the terms that they have a conviction under Colorado law. In other words, Chief Justice Bender seems to think the majority opinion creates perverse incentives to violate the deferred judgment conditions, while reducing incentives for defendants to use a mechanism that promotes efficient criminal adjudications.

This is perverse indeed. Still, there’s some good news contained in the majority’s opinion. It clearly leaves open an option through which to raise ineffective assistance claims, including those based on Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010). That, of course, raises a host of complications and obstacles, but it’s certainly better than nothing.

[Update (March 31, 2014): An Ohio intermediate appellate court came to a similar conclusion about a pretrial diversion program available in Cuyahoga County, the county in which Cleveland is located. State v. Kona, No. 100191, 2014-Ohio-1242 (Ohio Ct. App. March 27, 2014).]

[Update (April 6, 2014): The Tennessee Supreme Court took a similar approach to a guilty plea expunged after successful completion of judicial diversion in accordance with Tennessee state law. Rodriguez v. State of Tennessee, No. M2011-01485-SC-R11-PC, slip op. (Tenn. April 4, 2014).]

[Update (March 26, 2015): The Colorado Court of Appeals distinguished Kazadi and allowed a migrant to attempt to withdraw his deferred judgment conviction. People v. Corrales-Castro, 2015 COA 34 (Colo. Ct. App. March 26, 2015).]

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on February 7, 2013 on 9:00 am 11 Comments
Filed Under: Colorado state court, conviction, Ohio state court, post-conviction relief, sentence, state court

Comments

  1. building solar panels says

    March 27, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    building solar panels

    I love what you guys are usually up too. This type of clever work and exposure! Keep up the very good works guys I’ve added you guys to my own blogroll.

    Reply
  2. payday loans says

    April 19, 2013 at 9:18 pm

    payday loans

    This is a set of words, not an essay. you will be incompetent

    Reply
  3. Cheap Oakley M Frame says

    July 9, 2013 at 2:39 pm

    Cheap Oakley M Frame

    I am really delighted to read this blog posts which consists of lots of useful information, thanks for providing these kinds of data.

    Reply
  4. cheap louis vuitton bags says

    July 11, 2013 at 4:38 am

    cheap louis vuitton bags

    http://performancebegin.com/louis-vuitton-bags.html cheap louis vuitton bags

    Reply
  5. fake Oakley DisPatch II says

    July 15, 2013 at 1:30 pm

    fake Oakley DisPatch II

    Highly descriptive post, I enjoyed that a lot. Will there be a part 2?

    Reply
  6. Mens Oakleys says

    July 16, 2013 at 9:14 pm

    Mens Oakleys

    Have a good day!I’m very pleased when see your post.I quite agree with your viewpoint.I will continue to following on your blog.I believe that the future I will see more about your splendid views.

    Reply
  7. Oakley Holbrook says

    July 19, 2013 at 12:57 am

    Oakley Holbrook

    It is not my first time to pay a visit this site, i am visiting this site dailly and get good facts from here every day.

    Reply
  8. Cheap Oakley Pit Boss says

    July 29, 2013 at 1:27 am

    Cheap Oakley Pit Boss

    crImmigration.com: CO Supreme Ct: Motion to withdraw available for ineffective assistance claim based on deferred judgment

    Reply
  9. oakley outlet says

    August 2, 2013 at 8:01 am

    oakley outlet

    crImmigration.com: CO Supreme Ct: Motion to withdraw available for ineffective assistance claim based on deferred judgment

    Reply
  10. Ray Ban Sale says

    February 21, 2014 at 9:49 am

    Ray Ban Sale

    Prevent thinking about these folks & obtain these folks. Really worth every dime!\nRay Ban sunglasses are fashionable for women to wear in the summer, beautiful, when you are driving a car in the summer, wearing Ray Ban sunglasses you will get a better visual experience.They use the hormone laboratory, as well as wood products. They are usually used as well as in winter sports activities, with boating.Ray Ban sunglasses are selling hot, Ray Ban sunglasses sale, to meet the needs of different reflective coating. Stylish appearance and fashion style, it will be your good choice.Ray Ban is a leading multinational companies committed to providing products to consumers in over 100 countries / regions.If, as the great majority of the many women, you will no doubt be such as texture and shows the fashionable glasses and the fact that attention. One is definitely an excellent dietary supplement in the latest accessories direction.A specific polarization Ray Ban shades with contact lenses help to reduce the glare: It is important, retailers typically do not overlook the purchase of children’s funds involve Ray Ban tone.Since the Ray Ban Sunglasses Outlet sterling silver triangular mark is considered the most desired status symptoms within the custom entire world while offering widened into accessories including their notable Ray Ban tones.

    Reply
  11. qxmlbahy says

    March 6, 2014 at 12:43 pm

    qxmlbahy

    Agree with your post. Do you can keep update your post. I will back. thx!

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Mistakes aren’t reviewable, Supreme Court says
  • ICE prosecutorial discretion guidance
  • Supreme Court again considers ICE’s detention powers
  • Troubled contractor gets $180 million to hold young migrants
  • Chronicling Arizona’s Immigration Politics
  • Tracking ICE Surveillance

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.