This post could easily become an unbecoming rant, given the frustration that I share with my colleagues in the immigrant defense bar over the reasoning and outcome of Chaidez v. Holder, 568 U. S. ____, No. 11-820, slip op. (U.S. Feb. 20, 2013). Chaidez held that the Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, which as enumerated in Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S.Ct. 1473 (2010), includes the right to accurate advice regarding the obvious immigration consequences of a guilty plea, does not apply retroactively to cases that were final at the time Padilla was decided.
I was not terribly optimistic for retroactive application of Padilla after the oral argument, particularly given the change in court personnel through the retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, the author of Padilla. Whereas Justice Stevens not-so-subtly laid the bones for retroactivity throughout Padilla with his extensive ruminations on professional standards of representing criminal immigrants dating to the early 1990s, Justice Kagan and the Chaidez majority effectively ripped the heart out of Padilla in finding that, out of a generation of similarly situated defendants who received ineffective counsel, only Mr. Padilla himself may access post-conviction relief. Adding irony to injury was Justice Kagan, Stevens’ very replacement on the court, authoring the decision eviscerating the practical benefits to the aggrieved defendants who were seemingly empowered by Stevens and the Padilla majority in Stevens’ final term.
Why a new rule?
Of course, Stevens did not and could not rule on the retroactivity of Padilla since it was not the question presented there. Similarly, Chaidez was in some ways not the ideal vehicle for presenting the issue of retroactivity under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). Teague would require retroactivity only if either 1) Padilla was an “old rule” (i.e., dictated by precedent as an application of the classic Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), analysis to a new factual scenario of alleged ineffective counsel) or 2) a “new rule” that constituted a “watershed rule of criminal procedure.” For procedural reasons, Chaidez only could argue that Padilla was an old rule application of Strickland. Chaidez, slip. op. at 4, n.3.
This was the undoing of the case. Once the court was able to find Padilla was a “new rule” Chaidez was doomed. How Kagan did this required some logic that surprises and does not convince me.
Initially, Kagan accomplished her finding of “new rule” by recasting Padilla as a pair of successive questions: first, whether Strickland (and the Sixth Amendment) applied, and secondly, how it applied. Chaidez at 6. She then opined that because the court had had to consider the precursor question, then Padilla must represent a new rule. Id., at 9.
Kagan reinforced her “new rule” finding by investing the final third of her opinion in rejecting the argument of Chaidez (shared by the dissent) that Strickland dictated the result in Padilla, even though Justice Stevens (and the Padilla majority) had already held exactly that. In doing so, she restated the themes proclaimed in the Padilla concurrence and dissent (even acknowledging them in a lengthy footnote) that the pre-Padilla courts had uniformly found advice on immigration and other collateral consequences outside the scope of effective criminal counsel.
Of course, Stevens had observed the same facts of broad judicial error in Padilla. After noting that courts had generally found collateral matters outside the Sixth Amendment, Stevens directly addressed the courts’ misguided decisions noting “We, however, have never applied a distinction between direct and collateral consequences to define the scope of constitutionally “reasonable professional assistance” required under Strickland.” In other words, Padilla might be reversing a widely-held opinion, but that opinion was always wrong. Correcting the lower courts’ misapplication of the Sixth Amendment was not novel — it just looked that way because the courts had consistently made a mess of it.
Chaidez – and all other immigrant defendants – would have been better served if Chaidez could have also argued the possibility the Padilla was a new rule of watershed significance. Logically, it would be hard to imagine that Padilla is neither 1) an application of Strickland nor 2) a watershed event for the rights of immigrants. This posture would have robbed Kagan of the clarity in her argument that the sheer volume of adverse court decisions, pre-Padilla, indicated that it was a new rule.
Along this same line of thought, it is not possible for me to reconcile Chaidez with Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264 (2008). The Supreme Court discussed in Danforth that “‘[u]nder Teague, new rules will not be applied or announced in cases on collateral review unless they fall into one of two [Teague] exceptions.’” Danforth, at 267, n.1 (2008), citing Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Further, when a case is on collateral review and the holding sought by the defendant would announce a new rule that does not fit a Teague exception, the Supreme Court will refuse to apply or announce the rule in that case. See Graham v. Collins, 506 U.S. 461, 463 (1993). In other words, if it was both “new” and “non-retroactive,” Padilla could not have been decided at all, as it would violate Teague. Now we know that Padilla represented a “new” rule. How is this reconcilable?
Additionally, in the Chaidez opinion, Kagan referenced Santos-Sanchez v. United States, 548 F.3d 327, 334 (5th Cir. 2008). See Chaidez, slip op. at 7. This is a curious case to mention in a case finding non-retroactivity, because (as widely observed by attorneys engaged in post-Padilla litigation), it represents support for retroactive application of Padilla, because the case was remanded by the U.S. Supreme Court after the Court issued Padilla. See Santos-Sanchez v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2340 (2010). It is significant that Santos-Sanchez, a permanent resident alien of the United States since 2001, was arrested on September 6, 2003, and charged with aiding and abetting the illegal entry of an alien. See Santos-Sanchez, 548 F.3d at 329. Two days later, Santos-Sanchez appeared before a magistrate judge and pleaded guilty. Id. Thus, his plea pre-dated Padilla by approximately six and one half years. Santos-Sanchez was on appeal at the U.S. Supreme Court when Padilla was decided. The Court remanded it to the Fifth Circuit, apparently applying Padilla to a case final prior to Padilla being decided.
On remand, the Santos-Sanchez post-conviction trial court, logically found that it did not matter which Teague test was applied, as each test would result in the retroactive application of Padilla:
“Normally, the Court would be compelled to choose one of these unattractive options [“old rule” or “new rule” exception]. However, that decision is unnecessary in this case because each of the available options requires retroactive application of Padilla to cases on collateral review. Since Padilla itself was on collateral review and it both announced and applied its own rule, this Court is compelled to reach the merits of Santos-Sanchez’ Padilla claim.”
Santos-Sanchez v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95442 (S. Dist. Tex, Aug. 24, 2011), at 32. The District Court then denied Santos-Sanchez’s claim on other grounds.
Where is the justice in the world after Frye, Lafler and Padilla?
Recently, it had seemed that the U.S. Supreme Court both understood the fallibility of the contemporary world of criminal plea bargaining and was trending toward providing protections from injustices outside those typically asserted at trial. In the present day, over 95% of criminal convictions are achieved via guilty pleas. Consequently, the traditional notion of constitutional rights as asserted in a trial is largely an anachronism. In the recent decision Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012), and Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012), the Supreme Court noted that the traditional criminal justice system has been replaced by the contemporary plea bargain scheme. In Lafler and Frye, the Court acknowledged what had long been obvious to the criminal bar, namely that close attention must be given to attorney conduct in the plea context, in addition to a defendant’s rights at trial, because the plea arena is now where 95% of the benefits (and missteps) of attorney representation are actualized.
Although Lafler, Frye and Padilla acknowledge the problem of constitutional protections in the plea bargaining process, the Court apparently lacks the willingness to follow the logic of the decisions to permit correction of curable tainted convictions. The very problem of the Chaidez decision is illustrated in its precise holding: “Under Teague, defendants whose convictions became final prior to Padilla therefore cannot benefit from its holding.” Slip Op. at 15. Post-conviction relief generally is sought in cases that are final. Guilty pleas are rarely appealed and frequently are plea bargains are regularly accompanied by waivers of appeal (and in some jurisdictions also by waivers of rights to contest the effective representation of counsel at the plea hearing). Thus, the post-conviction relief described in Padilla is inherently a backward-looking process that exists beyond the scope of the initial proceeding. Chaidez had gone so far as to argue that because collateral attacks on the constitutional shortcomings in the plea bargain process are essentially first actions equivalent of direct review on appeal (an initial challenge to the constitutionality of the plea process), Teague should be inapplicable. The Court found this issue to be waived.
What is a final conviction and when does finality occur? Generally, one thinks of the conclusion of the appellate period of the case-in-chief. In some jurisdictions, it is the end of the period in which the period for bringing timely post-conviction claims has expired. Either way, this means that there is (or was) a class of cases actionable under Chaidez where the plea occurred prior to Padilla but the decision became “final” later, crossing some temporal Maginot Line so important to the Teague analysis in Chaidez.
In other words, the Court contemplates that in some cases, Padilla benefits apply to cases that pre-date Padilla. While this may create a happy result for the beneficiaries under this scheme, this “semi-retroactivity” makes little logical sense.
Padilla prospectively remains wonderful empowering news for defendants and attorneys, as it requires holistic, well-informed practice that should improve the fairness of the criminal justice system. Unfortunately, in a different track, the entirely unconvincing logic of Chaidez will only add to the bitterness of the coming years, in which more and more cases will arrive in immigration court with immigrants facing certain deportation and all of the parties knowing that the basis for deportation was achieved via constitutionally suspect, yet now incurable, means.
Michael S. Vastine is Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Immigration Clinic at St. Thomas University School of Law in Miami, Florida. His practice and research focus on immigration litigation, particularly regarding the deportation consequences of criminal convictions and the due process rights of immigrants. He co-represents the lead case construing the scope of Padilla in the Florida courts, Hernandez v. State, in which the Florida Supreme Court found against retroactivity under the state retroactivity analysis.
I have a stupid question (because I don’t deal with immigration issues very often)…. What happens to the argument that “Padilla” was a watershed?
As I read “Chaidez,” the primary argument is that “Padilla” wasn’t new law. Kagan argues, somewhat unconvincingly, that it was new. But the opinion expressly says that Chaidez didn’t argue that this was “watershed”-level new, and so therefore doesn’t reach that argument. “Chaidez” simply says that “Padilla” doesn’t apply retroactively because, prior to “Padilla,” reasonable attorneys and judges would differ on whether you had an obligation to advise the defendant about what pleading guilty would mean for their current or any future immigration problem.
I think it would be difficult to raise that argument now, but I don’t see that it’s been completely ruled out. I’m dumb about this, so I must be wrong; what am I not seeing?
I have a stupid question (because I don’t deal with immigration issues very often)…. What happens to the argument that “Padilla” was a watershed?
As I read “Chaidez,” the primary argument is that “Padilla” wasn’t new law. Kagan argues, somewhat unconvincingly, that it was new. But the opinion expressly says that Chaidez didn’t argue that this was “watershed”-level new, and so therefore doesn’t reach that argument. “Chaidez” simply says that “Padilla” doesn’t apply retroactively because, prior to “Padilla,” reasonable attorneys and judges would differ on whether you had an obligation to advise the defendant about what pleading guilty would mean for their current or any future immigration problem.
I think it would be difficult to raise that argument now, but I don’t see that it’s been completely ruled out. I’m dumb about this, so I must be wrong; what am I not seeing?
best replica hermes
louis vuitton hlouis vuitton handbags replicabags replica Herm猫s collection, louis vuitton hlouis vuitton handbags replicabags replica if so, you know how lucky you
diy solar panels electricity
Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the pictures on this blog loading? I’m trying to figure out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog. Any responses would be greatly appreciated.
building a solar panel
Hiya, neat website you have there.|
payday loans uk
Thanks for what you might have. This is the most effective submit I’ve read
OaklEy DiSpatcH SunglaSSES
If you thinkI do not care to catch sight of this article, the next time I am paid more attention to about your article, I think I will never again careless. Do you believe in yourself, you do not know your article can make people so obsessed with.
http://testerol-o.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Reverse Lookup
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Reverse Phone Number Lookup
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
mobile bingo
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
mobile bingo
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
car valuation text
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Reverse Phone Number Lookup
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cheapest car insurance
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
phentermine journal
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/greg-dash/5b/390/697
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
electronic cigarette blu
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
donald bernard colvin
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
free mobile bingo
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
credit card consolidation loans
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Donald Ray Bernard
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
where can I buy 7 keto
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
bingo mobile
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Phentermine 37.5
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
how to get your ex back poems
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
internet marketing las vegas
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://testerol-o.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
San Diego wedding photographer
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://www.hghignite.info/
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Baltimore SEO Company
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
credit card consolidation loans
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
how to get your ex girlfriend back
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
bingo mobile
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
human growth hormone booster
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Reverse Phone Number Lookup
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Phentermine diet pills
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
hgh
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Phentermine diet pills
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
credit card debt consolidation
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
car valuation new zealand free
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
San Diego wedding photography
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
car valuation list
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Donald Ray Bernard
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
car valuation calculator .co.za
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
hgh
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy 7 keto
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
wedding photographer los angeles
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
how to get your ex girlfriend back
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Reverse Phone Lookup
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
phentermine que es
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy 7 keto
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
car valuation hyderabad
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
credit consolidation michigan
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Phentermine diet pills
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cheapest car insurance
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://www.amazon.com/Garcinia-Pure-180-Capsules-Cambogia/dp/B00AVYYP2O/
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
Phentermine sale
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://www.speedycarvaluation.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
electronic cigarette bad
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia cambogia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
electronic cigarettes you can buy stores
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
best e cigs
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia extract
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://www.databytez.com/
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy electronic cigarettes
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia cambogia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
v2 cigs coupon
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
electronic cigarettes safe
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
electronic cigarettes vs cigarettes
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://ecigre.tumblr.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
smokeless cigarettes
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://cialis-italia.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil kopen
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy e cigarette
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis young men
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy provigil online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
christmas board game
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
vaporizer ego
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
escort london
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
vaporizer for sale
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://cialis-italia.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
provigil yahoo answers
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://thevapechief.info
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
lifelock promo
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
escort london
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
provigil vs adderall
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy electronic cigarettes
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://www.amazon.com/Garcinia-Pure-180-Capsules-Cambogia/dp/B00AVYYP2O/
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
best e cigarette 2013
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
best e cigarette 2013
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia kola
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
vaporizer double mountain
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
electronic cigarette juice
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
escorts london
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
vaporizer for sale
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia quaesita fruit
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
provigil nuvigil
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia extract
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia spicata
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
vaporizer under 100
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
provigil
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
garcinia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis generico
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy provigil
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
vaporizer pax
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
tramadol getting high
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://modafinilaustralia.webs.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil australia
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://modafinilaustralia.webs.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
volcano vaporizer
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil reviews
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
acquisto cialis
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
tramadol
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis jelly review
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis black
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy provigil
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
london escorts
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil addiction
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
lifelock promo
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil in australia online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
volcano vaporizer
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil vs adrafinil
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil australia online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis manufacturer coupon
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://thechristmasgame.co.uk
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
cialis no prescription paypal
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
acquisto cialis
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
buy modafinil online
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://lifelockpromocode.webs.com
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
modafinil zoloft
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
http://thechristmasgame.co.uk
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez
sac celine luggag
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
google
G http://images.google.com.hk/
google
G http://images.google.com.hk/
Oakley M Frame
Hello, for all time i used to check website posts here in the early hours in the morning, for the reason that i enjoy to learn more and more.
Fake oakleys
Wow! It a fastidious jQuery script; I was also looking for that, thus i got it right now from at this place. Keep it up admin of this site.
Louis Vuitton Outlet
Take a stroll around TST, passing by friendly knots of thirdworld hustlers hanging out in front of the Chungking Mansions, the immigrant ghetto of Kowloon that serves as temporary living quarters for Hong Kong’s financially insolvent migrs.
hermes replica
A member of the governor’s cabinet resigned after agents searched his home.
fake raybans
Your article is here, the feeling of a mere individual can bring in more.Let these people from all over the world, even in the heart with eudaemonia. We are not solitary.
fake Oakley Gascan
crImmigration.com: Trying (& Failing) to Find Logic in Chaidez