crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Talks & Media

Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

Last month’s release of immigrants from immigration detention centers brought praise from immigrants’ rights advocates and impassioned criticism from conservative politicians. House Speaker John Boehner decried the decision to “let criminals go free” and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Bob Goodlatte added, “By releasing criminal immigrants onto the streets, the administration is needlessly endangering American lives.”

It was no surprise that the White House quickly distanced itself from last month’s events. The Obama Administration has expanded the immigration detention population like no other. Last year’s 429,247 detainees represent the highest number of people ever detained in a single year by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, the Department of Homeland Security unit responsible for detaining people who are waiting to learn whether they will be allowed to remain in the United States. With a population of this size under its control ICE is the largest imprisoning agency in the country and spends about $2 billion a year doing that.

Meanwhile ICE explained that it vetted the 2,228 released individuals to ensure that they did not pose a danger to the public or flight risk. Everyone released remains in deportation proceedings and must keep in close contact with ICE agents.

Unprecedented numbers of immigration prisoners didn’t arise accidentally or even because of any increase in criminal activity by immigrants. In fact, foreign-born individuals tend to commit less crime than native-born individuals. Instead, these eye-popping numbers developed because the Obama Administration, building off a trend that began in the last years of the Bush Administration, decided it need to be tough on immigrants to convince skeptical lawmakers to come around on comprehensive immigration reform. Whether that calculation will pay off or whether the cost will end up being worth it remains to be seen.

What we do know is that the rise in immigration imprisonment has caught up hundreds of thousands of people who pose no particular danger to society. An immigrant convicted of possessing a handful of marijuana joints, for example, must be imprisoned while an immigration judge decides whether this is enough to deport him. The same goes for a business owner who lies on income tax returns or a young man who jumps a turnstile to get onto the subway. None of these acts inspire much fear, but all are subject to mandatory detention. No judge gets to consider whether these people are dangerous or present a risk of not showing up for their court dates.

People who commit these types of offenses aren’t unusual. Of the 188,382 people deported last year with some type of criminal record 23% had been involved in a drug offense and 22.8% of a traffic crime. Another 19.9% were deported because they were convicted of an immigration crime, activity like entering the country clandestinely that the Obama Administration has increasingly addressed through criminal courts rather than civil immigration courts–again departing from the historical norm.

A 2009 analysis by President Obama’s immigration detention reform point person revealed that a mere 11% of immigration detainees had been convicted of a violent crime. Many of these have lived in the United States for years as permanent residents (green card holders) with permission to live and work here indefinitely. During that time they have developed roots in their communities making them less likely to skip a hearing.

What’s more, many people subjected to detention haven’t been convicted of any crime. People who are caught in the United States without permission to be here are frequently detained. The same goes for people who come to the United States to flee persecution; according to DHS, 15,769 asylum-seekers were detained in 2010, the last year for which statistics are available. Indeed, DHS has no authority to detain anyone on suspicion of having committed a crime or to punish a convicted individual. No matter how much it looks like criminal confinement, immigration detention is recognized by law to be “civil” detention, thus many of the constitutional limitations on the government’s power to deprive a person of his liberty don’t apply (e.g., the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel).

To assume that everyone in an immigration prison is a criminal or dangerous, as Boehner and Goodlatte did, is factually incorrect. Immigration prisons reflect the rest of our society: many have committed crimes and a small percentage has actually committed dangerous crimes. But to cast a broad-stroked denunciation that they are all criminals or dangerous, as conservative politicians and commentators did last month, is misinformed.

They alone, however, are not to blame. Putting people in jumpsuits, locking them behind bars, or surrounding them with barbed wire leads to the conclusion that those people must be dangerous. Why else would the government go to the trouble and expense? Comments like Boehner’s and Goodlatte’s suggest an unmistakable logic: If we treat them like criminals, it’s because they must be dangerous. Such reasoning, however, doesn’t match the reality of immigration detention today.

The only way to avoid this is to stop treating immigrants as if they are dangerous when they are not. If last month’s surprise move by ICE accomplishes nothing more, hopefully it will prompt us to ask whether we want to continue relying so heavily on confinement as a tool for enforcing immigration law.

This essay originally appeared on NACLA’s Border Wars blog on March 27, 2013. It’s reposted with permission.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on March 28, 2013 on 9:00 am 51 Comments
Filed Under: CCA/CoreCivic, commentaries, imprisonment, mandatory detention, Scholars Sidebar

Comments

  1. buy toms shoes says

    April 9, 2013 at 11:32 pm

    buy toms shoes

    firma erdol weź się pan odpierdol

    Reply
  2. DnyWJcwj says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    DnyWJcwj

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  3. labuFWaE says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    labuFWaE

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  4. FLOCMxpy says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    FLOCMxpy

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  5. wWNPRQve says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    wWNPRQve

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  6. oKBNopKC says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    oKBNopKC

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  7. MpasMifd says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    MpasMifd

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  8. jgJzPdJU says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    jgJzPdJU

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  9. fVkSSYzg says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:11 am

    fVkSSYzg

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  10. GimECWJP says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:12 am

    GimECWJP

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  11. zfSYeSSt says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:13 am

    zfSYeSSt

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  12. DKOratYY says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:15 am

    DKOratYY

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  13. vcjSqcNw says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:15 am

    vcjSqcNw

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  14. ZAqFNeUs says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:15 am

    ZAqFNeUs

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  15. JhfjLzai says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:17 am

    JhfjLzai

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  16. EJewZNWE says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:24 am

    EJewZNWE

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  17. yHAYZSMH says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:35 am

    yHAYZSMH

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  18. fCbnNCrx says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:58 am

    fCbnNCrx

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  19. yOesYuVe says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:58 am

    yOesYuVe

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  20. sMMfcIhr says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:58 am

    sMMfcIhr

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  21. UawHePvR says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:58 am

    UawHePvR

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  22. kwIBcDku says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:58 am

    kwIBcDku

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  23. HIBaYmWD says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:58 am

    HIBaYmWD

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  24. leKILRmD says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:58 am

    leKILRmD

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  25. rUAsnxtx says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:59 am

    rUAsnxtx

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  26. WAMXvYzY says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:59 am

    WAMXvYzY

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  27. zAklxBxF says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:59 am

    zAklxBxF

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  28. hXBOFURb says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:59 am

    hXBOFURb

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  29. LfcJpwkK says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:59 am

    LfcJpwkK

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  30. vHjSjRDi says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:59 am

    vHjSjRDi

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  31. HAXpuHDS says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:00 am

    HAXpuHDS

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  32. dCtCtVTd says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:00 am

    dCtCtVTd

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  33. gOUayVuW says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:00 am

    gOUayVuW

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  34. lMCJXauB says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:00 am

    lMCJXauB

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  35. KAXOLsFV says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:01 am

    KAXOLsFV

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  36. heHMgHPj says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:02 am

    heHMgHPj

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  37. ootQlaNj says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:04 am

    ootQlaNj

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  38. DTQxsRek says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:06 am

    DTQxsRek

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  39. aTplbSyQ says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:16 am

    aTplbSyQ

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  40. iCVWSBXA says

    April 12, 2013 at 7:25 am

    iCVWSBXA

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  41. Cheap Burberry Bags says

    April 12, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    Cheap Burberry Bags

    Hi there, after reading this remarkable article i am too delighted to share my experience here with friends.

    Reply
  42. Burberry Bags says

    April 12, 2013 at 4:15 pm

    Burberry Bags

    I must show my appreciation to this writer just for rescuing me from this type of dilemma. Just after checking throughout the search engines and meeting suggestions which are not helpful, I believed my life was gone. Existing minus the approaches to the problems you’ve resolved through the site is a critical case, as well as the ones which may have badly affected my career if I hadn’t discovered your web site. Your own personal competence and kindness in touching almost everything was crucial. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t encountered such a subject like this. I am able to at this point look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for this impressive and effective guide. I will not be reluctant to propose the blog to any individual who should have support on this issue.

    Reply
  43. Burberry Bags says

    April 12, 2013 at 6:23 pm

    Burberry Bags

    I really like the Burberry Bags a lot of!!! I found any proverb brief and so i enjoy it sooo much! Concerning dropped lemonade, syrup plus normal water however in that respect there comfortably washed!! Can’t put it off to obtain the further pair of Bailey Multiple Press button Excessive!!!!! Equals)

    Reply
  44. ybQNnNPI says

    April 13, 2013 at 6:49 am

    ybQNnNPI

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  45. Kfjbdhbd says

    April 13, 2013 at 6:49 am

    Kfjbdhbd

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  46. gUYnDriC says

    April 13, 2013 at 6:49 am

    gUYnDriC

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  47. aNDrmZTx says

    April 13, 2013 at 6:50 am

    aNDrmZTx

    crImmigration.com: Time to Rethink Immigration Detention

    Reply
  48. payday loans uk says

    May 6, 2013 at 8:06 pm

    payday loans uk

    Reading this post – the present of your time

    Reply
  49. cheap oakley sunglasses says

    May 26, 2013 at 2:57 am

    cheap oakley sunglasses

    YouTube movies are famous in whole globe, because it is the biggest video sharing site, and I turn out to be too delighted by watching YouTube movies.

    Reply
  50. mbt says

    July 16, 2013 at 8:33 am

    mbt

    To find out what BTN games your cable or satellite provider will be showing on Saturday, please start by entering your zip code and provider below.

    Reply
  51. new york auto insurance says

    July 16, 2013 at 9:32 pm

    new york auto insurance

    http://hurriedfixationposts.wallinside.com

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Uvalde massacre & immigration law aid
  • Mistakes aren’t reviewable, Supreme Court says
  • ICE prosecutorial discretion guidance
  • Supreme Court again considers ICE’s detention powers
  • Troubled contractor gets $180 million to hold young migrants
  • Chronicling Arizona’s Immigration Politics

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.