crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed a favorable summary judgment disposition and jury award involving a woman who was shackled while giving birth after she was caught driving without a license and processed through a 287(g) program. Villegas v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, No. 11-6031, slip op. (6th Cir. Mar. 4, 2013) (Clay, Gibbons, and White, JJ.). Judge Clay delivered the panel’s majority opinion. Judge White dissented.

This case involves a woman who was pulled over for a traffic offense. When she failed to produce a driver’s license, the officer arrested her, took her to the county jail, and processed her identification information through the county’s 287(g) program. ICE then placed an immigration detainer on her. As a result of the detainer, the county jail classified her as a medium-security inmate. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 2. Two days later Villegas went into labor and an ambulance was called to take her to the local hospital.

What happened next is startling so I’ll quote at length:

For transportation in the ambulance, Plaintiff was placed on a stretcher with her wrists handcuffed together in front of her body and her legs restrained together. According to Defendant Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, because hospitals are “conducive to security breaches including escape,” medium-security inmates at hospitals remain shackled until they return to jail. Two male officers (Matthew Barshaw and Thomas Farragher) accompanied Plaintiff in the ambulance to the Hospital with Barshaw riding in the front seat and Farragher in the back with Plaintiff. Barshaw questioned his supervisor about the leg restraints because “what if all of a sudden the baby started [and it] took more time to unrestrain these restraints in the back of the ambulance.”

Upon arriving at the Hospital, Farragher removed Plaintiff’s shackles at the request of Hospital staff so that Plaintiff could change into a hospital gown. Barshaw and Farragher remained in the room with Plaintiff with their backs turned as she changed, and after she finished, they again restrained her. Shortly after Plaintiff arrivedat the Hospital, officer Brandi Moore arrived to relieve Barshaw and Farragher. Farragher informed Moore that Plaintiff was a “medium-security inmate” with a “hold” or “detainer” in her file and gave Moore a “charge sheet,” indicating Plaintiff’s name, charge, and custody level. After Farragher and Barshaw left, Moore removed Plaintiff’s handcuffs but kept one of Plaintiff’s legs restrained to the hospital bed.

At some point during Moore’s shift, Moore overheard Hospital staff talking to a doctor about a “No Restraint Order” but claims that she never received such an order from the Hospital. Additionally, Moore admitted to having been told by a nurse that she “shouldn’t put leg irons on [Plaintiff],” but the conversation ended there. At 11:20 p.m., a Hospital doctor signed a physician’s order stating: “Please remove shackles,” and this order was placed in Plaintiff’s hospital file, though never specifically given to any officer. Moore was relieved by officer David Peralta at 11:00 p.m. on June 5th and told Peralta to “be prepared for a no restraint order.”

Shortly after the shift change, Peralta removed Plaintiff’s restraints. According to hospital records, when the shackles were removed, Plaintiff had only dilated to 3 centimeters (“cm”). Plaintiff did not become dilated to 4 cm, a point that Defendant contends is medically relevant, until 11:45 p.m. It was around this time that Plaintiff also first requested pain medication, which she received in the form of an epidural. Plaintiff gave birth without any complications at approximately 1:00 a.m on July 6, 2008—roughly two hours after Peralta removed her shackles. Plaintiff remained unshackled until shortly before Peralta’s shift ended at 7:00 a.m., when he re-restrained Plaintiff to the bed at one of her ankles. Plaintiff was never handcuffed postpartum”

Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 3-4

In addition, Villegas was not allowed to take a breast pump issued by the hosital to the jail because it was not deemed a “critical medical device. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 4.

The federal district court granted Villegas’s summary judgment motion claiming that the jail staff were deliberately indifferent to her need to be unrestrained while in labor and to her postpartum medical needs by denying her access to the breast pump. Both are claims that fall within the Eight Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 5-6. A jury awarded her $200,000 in damages. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 5.

The Sixth Circuit reversed the trial court’s summary judgment disposition. First, the court concluded that there exists a factual dispute about whether Villegas posed a risk of flight. If she did, then, as the court recounted, restraints would be consistent with American Medical Association and United Nations standards regarding custody. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 15. In addition, the court concluded that there remains a factual dispute about the risk posted by shackling. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 18.

Secondly, the court concluded that there was no evidence indicating that the breast pump was issued as part of a treatment plan. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 22. The evidence showed “little more than the fact that Hospital staff handed her a breast pump as she was being discharged.” Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 22. Testimony from a psychiatrist and an ob/gyn “that a breast pump was necessary to allow Plaintiff to express her milk and relieve her breast pain,” the court explained, “does not speak specifically to the obviousness of the risk to Plaintiff” of being denied access to the breast pump. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 22. Therefore, summary judgment on this issue was also inappropriate.

In a spirited dissent, Judge White pointed out that Villegas was treated in this manner for no reason except that her immigration status automatically subjected her to a medium-security classification under the theory “that illegal immigrants in general pose a danger of flight.” Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 26 (White, J., dissenting). It was not based on any assessment of Villegas’s flight risk or danger to the public. Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 26 (White, J., dissenting). Indeed, “[i]n order to flee or pose a threat, Villegas would have had to harm or elude armed officer(s) and the nurse authorizing entry and exit from the maternity ward charged with unlocking the doors.” Villegas, No. 11-6031, slip op. at 27 (White, J., dissenting).

Update: The New York Times reported on October 18, 2013 that Villegas reached a settlement with the county and that a federal judge recommended she be allowed to remain in the United States.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on April 23, 2013 on 9:00 am 22 Comments
Filed Under: 287(g), 6th Circuit Court of Appeals

Comments

  1. maillot de foot says

    May 15, 2013 at 5:06 pm

    maillot de foot

    la victime arsenal vs ac milan live donné vendredi une  claque sur la tête de son camarade. Le scandale du cheval sest poursuivi ce week-end en Europe avec des maillot de foot un peu partout sauce? ? Le Premier ministre palestinien choqué Environ 3, 800 personnes arsenal barcelone 2010 CDI doit fermer en 2014 dans le cadre dun vaste plan de restructuration annoncé en juillet, ?Elle doit compléter la gamme du effectif de la juventus 1 mondial des téléphones portables. ?De la viande de cheval a été trouvée pour la première fois dans des lasagnes à la bolognaise en Italie! ladministration centrale du Saint-Siège! PolitiqueLes quatre principaux candidats à la primaire socialiste à Marseille seraient en mesure chacun demporter la mairie face à son actuel locataire Jean-Claude Gaudin UMP.

    Reply
  2. Burberry Outlet Store says

    May 16, 2013 at 6:05 am

    Burberry Outlet Store

    Personal brand Legal rights for as well as Private lable rights E is truly a very quickly escalating niche amongst world-wide-web savvy founders,Burberry. No matter whether you might be a brand-new comer to be able to profit via the internet or have been popular some time,Burberry Watch, PLR are something you require to make a look at.

    Reply
  3. Cheap Oakley Mens says

    May 26, 2013 at 2:26 am

    Cheap Oakley Mens

    On every weekend, we all mates jointly used to watch film, as fun is also necessary in life.

    Reply
  4. cheap oakely sunglasses says

    May 31, 2013 at 10:42 pm

    cheap oakely sunglasses

    If you apply these kinds of strategies for increasing traffic on your own webpage, I am as expected you will see the change in few days.

    Reply
  5. discount louis vuitton bags says

    June 10, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    discount louis vuitton bags

    Your article crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth write very well, thank you share!

    Reply
  6. Cheap Oakley Radarlock Sunglasses says

    July 2, 2013 at 10:44 am

    Cheap Oakley Radarlock Sunglasses

    If you are interested to learn Search engine optimization methods then you should read this article, I am sure you will get much more from this paragraph concerning Search engine optimization.

    Reply
  7. OAkLey FLAk JAcket says

    July 2, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    OAkLey FLAk JAcket

    Obviously high resolution film quality carries much memory, that why it gives superior feature.

    Reply
  8. fake Oakley DisPatch II says

    July 10, 2013 at 5:05 am

    fake Oakley DisPatch II

    I would like to know when you write this article is what kind of mood, why would you write this article, also written so good, is that I can learn. I think I could record something like you.

    Reply
  9. google says

    July 11, 2013 at 7:28 am

    google

    G http://images.google.com.hk/

    Reply
  10. Mens Oakley Sunglasses says

    July 12, 2013 at 1:02 am

    Mens Oakley Sunglasses

    If you are going for finest contents like me, just go to see this site daily because it provides quality contents, thanks

    Reply
  11. Cheap Oakley Whisker says

    July 21, 2013 at 12:31 pm

    Cheap Oakley Whisker

    Nice response in return of this matter with real arguments and describing the whole thing regarding that.

    Reply
  12. Fake Oakleys says

    July 22, 2013 at 9:20 pm

    Fake Oakleys

    crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

    Reply
  13. Oakley Sunglasses Outlet says

    July 25, 2013 at 9:14 pm

    Oakley Sunglasses Outlet

    crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

    Reply
  14. Fake ray ban Sunglsses says

    July 26, 2013 at 11:09 am

    Fake ray ban Sunglsses

    crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

    Reply
  15. Oakley Outlet says

    July 26, 2013 at 3:27 pm

    Oakley Outlet

    crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

    Reply
  16. Replica Oakley Radarlock XL says

    July 30, 2013 at 10:35 pm

    Replica Oakley Radarlock XL

    crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

    Reply
  17. Replica Oakley Offshoot says

    August 1, 2013 at 7:45 am

    Replica Oakley Offshoot

    crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

    Reply
  18. Cheap ray bans says

    August 2, 2013 at 5:13 am

    Cheap ray bans

    crImmigration.com: 6 Cir: Driving while undocumented leads to shackled while giving birth

    Reply
  19. ugg boots cheap says

    December 14, 2013 at 9:47 pm

    ugg boots cheap

    ugg boots for women discount

    Reply
  20. uggs outlet online says

    December 29, 2013 at 9:31 pm

    uggs outlet online

    where can i buy ugg boots in australia

    Reply
  21. Ray Ban Sunglasses says

    February 21, 2014 at 1:52 pm

    Ray Ban Sunglasses

    The post is written in very a good manner and it entails much useful information for me.\nRay Ban Wayfarer sunglasses are simply the most recognizable style in the history of sunglasses. The Wayfarer distinct shape is paired with the traditional Ray Ban signature logo on the sculpted temples. After its initial design in 1952, the Ray Ban Wayfarer quickly endeared itself to Hollywood filmmakers, celebrities, musicians, and artists; solidifying its iconic status for years to come. The Ray Ban Wayfarer sunglasses are available in a contemporary color palette allowing the wearer to express their own style and personality through this unmistakable look. History, along with fresh colorful updates have made the Original Wayfarer sunglasses a symbol of youth, fashion, and creativity for over 50 years. The Ray Ban Wayfarer sunglasses are a must have for any collector or Ray Ban enthusiast.

    Reply
  22. cheap iphone 4 for sale says

    March 8, 2014 at 3:17 pm

    cheap iphone 4 for sale

    Heya i am for the primary time here. I found this board and I to find It really useful & it helped me out much. I am hoping to offer something back and help others like you helped me.|

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Cheap Oakley Mens Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Biden-Harris immigration priorities signal big shift, raise many questions
  • Biden’s Migration Policy Options
  • Migrating to Prison, one year later
  • With Biden returning to White House, private prison stock falls
  • New York Review of Books
  • Justice Dept pushes Supreme Court to Imperil Families

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.