crimmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Book Tour
  • Talks & Media

Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

A former student recently asked me about the immigration law implications of being found not guilty by reason of insanity. Specifically, the student wanted to know whether this was a “conviction” for immigration law purposes? Having never encountered this situation before, I was unsure. Frankly, I’m still not sure, but here are my thoughts.

The starting point seems to have to be the INA’s two-pronged definition of “conviction,” INA § 101(a)(48)(A). I’ll start with the second prong because I think that’s usually going to be easier to examine. INA § 101(a)(48)(A)(ii) requires that “the judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the alien’s liberty to be imposed.” In most instances where a criminal adjudication ends in a determination that the defendant is not guilty because of insanity the court will order the defendant into a psychiatric institution. I have little doubt that this would satisfy the “penalty” or “restraint” language of this provision. Indeed, an old BIA decision held that institutionalization in a state mental hospital could serve as the basis for a “conviction” even though the individual there was not ordered into a penal institution. Matter of V, 7 I. & N. Dec. 242 (BIA 1956). More recently, the BIA held that imposition of court costs constituted a “penalty” for INA § 101(a)(48)(A)(ii) purposes. Matter of Cabrera, 24 I. & N. Dec. 459 (BIA 2008). Without question, court costs are less restrictive than institutionalization in a psychiatric treatment center.

Now for the “conviction” definition’s first prong—that “a judge or jury has found the alien guilty or the alien has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or has admitted sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt.” INA § 101(a)(48)(A)(i). Whether or not this requirement is satisfied seems to turn on the particular criminal procedure used. In Colorado, where I currently live and teach, a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, according to the Colorado Supreme Court, “operates as an acquittal of the charged offenses.” People v. Laeke, 271 P.3d 1111, 1116 (Colo. 2012) (en banc). That seems sufficient to avoid being construed as a guilty plea.

In other cases, however, the Colorado Supreme Court explained that not guilty by reason of insanity is “a plea in the nature of confession and avoidance.” People v. Chavez, 629 P.2d 1040, 1047 (Colo. 1981). What this means, the court explained, is that “By asserting it the defendant admits the acts charged, but denies criminal culpability. The defendant’s denial of guilt is predicated on a claim of mental disease or defect which, by reason of its existence, relieves him of criminal responsibility for his conduct.” Chavez, 629 P.2d at 1047 (internal citations and quotations omitted). In other words, Colorado requires the defendant to admit having engaged in the acts charged but does not impose a punishment because the defendant is thought to have legally lacked the mental capacity to commit a crime.

This strikes me as enough to satisfy the “admitted sufficient facts” option of INA § 101(a)(48)(A)(i). Colorado NGRI plea, it seems, has an inherent quid pro quo—in exchange for avoiding criminal liability, the defendant must admit to having engaged in these actions. If I’m correct, then attorneys contemplating a NGRI plea for their noncitizen clients in Colorado and states with similar NGRI schemes ought to think long and hard about the possible immigration law consequences.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Posted by César on October 15, 2013 on 9:00 am 13 Comments
Filed Under: Colorado state court, conviction

Comments

  1. parajumpers danmark says

    December 18, 2013 at 10:22 pm

    parajumpers danmark

    http://www.supernatura.it/burberry.php 2013 new burberry good http://www.presidiosurgical.com/presidio.php louis vuitton bags very good http://www.florenciamartinez.com/maco.asp Gucci Breifcase Beige Ebony http://www.florenciamartinez.com/links.php black black ugg classic mini boots

    Reply
  2. uggs outlet online says

    December 23, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    uggs outlet online

    best price on girls ugg boots

    Reply
  3. tewfzjcm says

    March 6, 2014 at 11:02 pm

    tewfzjcm

    Agree with your mind. Can you can keep update your post. I wanna back. bye!

    Reply
  4. zkzhcbiku says

    March 7, 2014 at 6:50 am

    zkzhcbiku

    Agree with your post. Do you can keep update your post. I wanna back. bye!

    Reply
  5. http://partydressess.blogtur.com/ says

    March 7, 2014 at 6:10 pm

    http://partydressess.blogtur.com/

    crImmigration.com: Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

    Reply
  6. http://www.5sn.co.uk/pandora-bracelets.html says

    March 9, 2014 at 2:45 pm

    http://www.5sn.co.uk/pandora-bracelets.html

    crImmigration.com: Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

    Reply
  7. http://saboschmuck.loveblog.com/ says

    March 11, 2014 at 6:50 am

    http://saboschmuck.loveblog.com/

    crImmigration.com: Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

    Reply
  8. maillot du real says

    March 12, 2014 at 5:17 am

    maillot du real

    Wonderful beat ! I want to apprentice whilst you amend your net internet site, how could I subscribe for a blog website? The account aided me a acceptable offer. I experienced been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast presented vibrant very clear notion

    Reply
  9. http://jordansshoeses.mee.nu/ says

    March 12, 2014 at 8:17 am

    http://jordansshoeses.mee.nu/

    crImmigration.com: Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

    Reply
  10. http://jordansshoese.blogspot.com/ says

    March 12, 2014 at 8:54 pm

    http://jordansshoese.blogspot.com/

    crImmigration.com: Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

    Reply
  11. l olympique says

    March 12, 2014 at 9:54 pm

    l olympique

    I am quite loved for this weblog. Its an insightful matter. It support me quite a lot to solve some troubles. Its chance are so wonderful and operating fashion so fast. I think it may possibly be help all of you.

    Reply
  12. natural garcinia cambogia says

    March 31, 2014 at 7:15 am

    natural garcinia cambogia

    crImmigration.com: Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

    Reply
  13. frznjmcyjr says

    April 4, 2014 at 5:46 am

    frznjmcyjr

    crImmigration.com: Is not guilty by reason of insanity an immigration conviction?

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Biden-Harris immigration priorities signal big shift, raise many questions
  • Biden’s Migration Policy Options
  • Migrating to Prison, one year later
  • With Biden returning to White House, private prison stock falls
  • New York Review of Books
  • Justice Dept pushes Supreme Court to Imperil Families

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.