crImmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Publications
  • Public Appearances
  • Book

5th Circuit addresses good moral character requirement for non-LPR cancellation

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently clarified two related requirements for obtaining Cancellation of Removal for non-Lawful Permanent Residents. Rodriguez-Avalos v. Holder, No. 13-60736, slip op. (5th Cir. March 4, 2015). Specifically, the court concluded that the good moral character requirement doesn’t involve an analysis of moral turpitude and that the applicant must have established GMC during the ten years immediately preceding the immigration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision.

This case involved a migrant who entered without inspection and was later convicted of lying about being a United States citizen (an offense related to his employment at an Omaha grocery store). Id. at 2. He was sentenced to 14 months and served about 7 months in prison. Id. DHS later initiated removal proceedings based on his entry without inspection and he conceded removability pursuant to INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i). At the same time, Rodríguez (that’s how the court refers to him) sought cancellation of removal for non-LPRs under INA § 240A(b). Id. at 2-3. Non-LPR cancellation requires that the applicant show that he has had good moral character (GMC).

The immigration judge denied his cancellation application on the basis that his conviction and time served meant he could not satisfy the GMC requirement. The BIA agreed. Id. at 3.

On appeal to the Fifth Circuit, Rodríguez made two arguments. First, he argued that his conviction doesn’t involve moral turpitude, thus it can’t preclude him from showing GMC. The Fifth Circuit did not buy this argument. INA § 101(f)(7) provides that a person can’t show GMC if she has been “confined, as a result of a conviction, to a penal institution for an aggregate of one hundred and eighty days or more.” It says nothing about moral turpitude. After reviewing existing BIA and federal court decisions the Fifth Circuit concluded that the BIA’s decision to interpret this language as having nothing to do with moral turpitude “is consistent with the plain text of the statute, the BIA precedent interpreting the Congressional intent of the statute, our non-binding precedent, and the persuasive authority from our sister-circuits.” Id. at 12.

Second, Rodríguez argued that the GMC requirement applies only to the 10 years immediately preceding the date he was served with the Notice to Appear that initiated removal proceedings. Id. at 13. The Fifth Circuit disagreed with this position too.

The court noted, as did Rodríguez, that the Board’s precedential decision in Matter of Ortega-Cabrera, 23 I&N Dec. 793, 798 (BIA 2005), clearly states that an applicant must show GMC during the ten years immediately preceding the final decision by the immigration judge or BIA. Id. at 13. Since then the BIA has reaffirmed this position and a few federal circuits have adopted it expressly or implicitly. Id. at 16.

The key statutory language, the Fifth Circuit, is ambiguous. Id. at 13. Crucially, the BIA’s interpretation is reasonable, thus under the deference that federal courts are required to give reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory text under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), the court upheld the BIA’s view. Id. at 18.

Find this information useful? Then let others know about crImmigration.com, as well as César’s Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn pages. And to make sure you don’t miss an update, subscribe to the blog by entering your email address in the subscription box that appears on every page.

  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Email

Posted by César on March 19, 2015 on 4:00 am Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, cancellation of removal, crime involving moral turpitude, good moral character

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe


César’s Recent Media

April 12: Quoted in article about brewing Fourth Amendment battle that develops when ICE arrests people inside homes [Read article here]

April 3: Quoted in Univision Noticias article about Trump's plans to deploy National Guard to border [Read article here (in Spanish)]

April 1: Quoted in article about Coloradans affected by Trump administration's decision to end TPS protections for citizens of some countries [Read article here]

March 29: Quoted in article about Fourth Amendment and ICE attempts to enter homes [Read article here]

March 16: Quoted discussing shifts between Obama and Trump administration immigration policing practices [Listen here]

March 8: Quoted discussing Justice Department lawsuit against California over its migrant-friendly policies [Read article here | Lea en español]

February 5: Quoted in article about Indiana death in drunk driving incident allegedly caused by unauthorized migrant [Read article here]

January 31: I'm quoted in San Francisco Chronicle about ICE's policy of arresting people in and near courthouses [Read article here]

January 18: I talked to CityLab about symbolic value of ICE raids on 7-11 stores [Read article here]

January 8: I'm quoted in Governing talking about ICE head's threats to imprison elected officials who support policies limiting cooperation with ICE [Read article here]

January 5: I'm quoted in article about San Antonio Police Department decision to prosecute alleged migrant smuggler under state law rather than hand over to ICE for federal prosecution [Read article here]

January 3: Quoted in article about ICE chief's threats to imprison elected officials who support migrant-friendly policies [Read article here]

2018

December 30: I'm quoted in The Atlantic discussing the special impact crimmigration policies have on black migrants [Read article here]

December 28: My crimmigration.com article about immigration prison population trends since 1990s makes Prison Policy Institute's "favorite criminal justice research of 2017" [Read PPI's list here]

December 22: Quoted in ThinkProgress article about legally dubious immigration detainer practices [Read article here]

December 20: Interviewed in Philadelphia NPR affiliate WHYY story about ICE arrests in area courthouses [Listen to story here]

December 12: My three-part white paper series on immigration detention published by Latino Community Foundation of Colorado [Read articles on adults, children and families, and vulnerable populations]

Learn more about César's media appearances here

Recent Posts

  • Legal limits on military deployment along US border
  • ICE transitioned from Obama to Trump with record high daily detention population
  • ICE detention population closed Obama era at record daily high
  • Immigration budget bill summary
  • Supreme Court to hear another immigration imprisonment case
  • Jennings v. Rodriguez highlights need for detention time limits

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.