crImmigration.com

The intersection of criminal law and immigration law

  • Home
  • About César
  • Publications
  • Public Appearances
  • Book

Supreme Court to hear another immigration imprisonment case

On the heels of its decision allowing prolonged confinement in an ICE detention center to continue, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to hear arguments in another case about the federal government’s practice or locking up migrants. Every day, the Department of Homeland Security detains roughly 34,000 individuals. At a cost of at least $126 per day per person, ICE spends more than $4 million daily to incarcerate. In Nielsen v. Preap, No. 14-16326, the Court will decide whether ICE is required to detain migrants who have served their jail or prison time for a laundry list of crimes and have [...]

Posted by César on March 20, 2018 on 5:28 am 4 Comments
Filed Under: alternatives to detention, bond, imprisonment, mandatory detention, U.S. Supreme Court

Jennings v. Rodriguez highlights need for detention time limits

Justine N. Stefanelli The US Supreme Court’s decision in Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. ___ (2018) (slip opinion), denying bail hearings to thousands of detainees is a serious blow to the rule of law. Detaining categories of people without regard to their individual circumstances is an arbitrary interference with the right to liberty and, at the very least, should be accompanied by procedural safeguards. The most obvious of these is a temporal limit on immigration detention. However, US immigration law provides no maximum. The closest the law has come is the setting of a presumptively [...]

Posted by César on March 16, 2018 on 12:30 am Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, bond, Due Process Clause, Europe, guest blogger, habeas, imprisonment, mandatory detention, U.S. Supreme Court

Judges can’t deny bail because ICE threatens removal

Focusing its sights squarely on criminal law’s intersection with immigration law, a federal appellate court concluded that judges can’t deny bail to migrant defendants simply because ICE threatens to deport them. The court’s opinion, in a case involving an illegal reentry prosecution, is an important reminder of the presumption of liberty in United States criminal law—and an equally stark example of ICE’s persistent efforts to pierce holes in that presumption. Mario Ailon-Ailon, a resident of Dodge City, Kansas for seven years, was arrested by ICE and handed over to the U.S. Marshals [...]

Posted by César on December 7, 2017 on 4:00 am Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, bond, detainer, illegal reentry, imprisonment

Massachusetts top court deals detainers another blow

In another loss for federal immigration officials, the highest court in Massachusetts decided yesterday that it is illegal under state law to hold someone on an immigration detainer. Lunn v. Commonwealth, No. SJC-12276, slip op. (Mass. July 24, 2017). This case involved a man who was held in a courthouse holding cell after the judge overseeing a criminal prosecution against him dismissed the case. [Disclosure: I was one of many immigration law scholars to sign a brief authored by my colleague Christopher Lasch submitted on behalf of Mr. Lunn.] The state’s Supreme Judicial Court easily [...]

Posted by César on July 25, 2017 on 4:00 am Leave a Comment
Filed Under: bond, detainer, imprisonment, local immigration policing, Massachusetts state court, state court

The rest of the National Guard memo

This morning’s news cycle was flooded by reports of a Trump Administration draft memorandum authorizing deployment of up to 100,000 National Guard troops for immigration policing activity. Even as a draft, it’s frightening that the federal government is articulating the kind of extremism not witnessed in the United States since Operation Wetback in the 1950s. Though long decried for its sheer cruelty, as a candidate Donald Trump praised it, claiming it was effective and popular. Fortunately, I am convinced that we are still a few steps away from launching a massive military campaign targeting [...]

Posted by César on February 17, 2017 on 4:44 pm 1 Comment
Filed Under: bond, expedited removal, imprisonment, Uncategorized

Should ICE or an immigration judge decide that a migrant deserves imprisonment?

The script is fairly simple: someone gets arrested and without much delay he is haled into court where a judge decides whether to grant bail. As depicted on television, this happens as a matter of routine. Everyone, it seems, accepts that it’s a judge’s role to decide whether a person who has been arrested should remain jailed pending prosecution. Not so when it comes to immigration law. Migrants are frequently locked up without seeing an immigration judge. Today, the Supreme Court hears arguments about the legality of prolonged mandatory detention without a hearing. In Jennings v. [...]

Posted by César on November 30, 2016 on 4:00 am Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 5th Amendment, bond, burden, Due Process Clause, U.S. Supreme Court

Fed govt misrepresentations about detention data matter

Last week we learned that the federal government provided the Supreme Court with bad data about the length of time migrants remain in detention. When? In 2002 as the Court geared up to consider what has become an enormously important decision, Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510 (2002). In Demore, the Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act’s so-called mandatory detention provision, § 236(c), is constitutionally permissible. For fourteen years, lower courts have dutifully followed the Court’s instruction. Now we know that the Court’s reasoning turned on wrong statistics. In its 2002 [...]

Posted by César on September 8, 2016 on 4:00 am Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 5th Amendment, bond, Due Process Clause, habeas, imprisonment, U.S. Supreme Court

1st Circuit rolls back detention reforms

In a disheartening move that is likely to create more impediments to migrants trying to escape detention pending removal proceedings, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit overturned a district court decision that imposed substantial limits on the federal government’s use of INA § 236(c), the so-called mandatory detention statute. Reid v. Donelan, No. 14-1270, slip op. (1st Cir. April 13, 2016). The court held that migrants detained unreasonably are entitled to an individualized hearing, but it tossed out the district court’s conclusion that the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause [...]

Posted by César on April 28, 2016 on 4:00 am Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, bond, burden, Due Process Clause, imprisonment

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Subscribe


César’s Recent Media

April 18: Quoted talking about ICE's efforts to conceal contents of training manuals used by its largest division, Homeland Security Investigations Read article here]

April 12: Discussed legal limits on deploying troops inside United States and the memory of Esequiel Hernández, Jr., teen shot by Marines in 1997 [Read article here (in Spanish)]

April 12: Quoted in article about brewing Fourth Amendment battle that develops when ICE arrests people inside homes [Read article here]

April 3: Quoted in Univision Noticias article about Trump's plans to deploy National Guard to border [Read article here (in Spanish)]

April 1: Quoted in article about Coloradans affected by Trump administration's decision to end TPS protections for citizens of some countries [Read article here]

March 29: Quoted in article about Fourth Amendment and ICE attempts to enter homes [Read article here]

March 16: Quoted discussing shifts between Obama and Trump administration immigration policing practices [Listen here]

March 8: Quoted discussing Justice Department lawsuit against California over its migrant-friendly policies [Read article here | Lea en español]

February 5: Quoted in article about Indiana death in drunk driving incident allegedly caused by unauthorized migrant [Read article here]

January 31: I'm quoted in San Francisco Chronicle about ICE's policy of arresting people in and near courthouses [Read article here]

January 18: I talked to CityLab about symbolic value of ICE raids on 7-11 stores [Read article here]

January 8: I'm quoted in Governing talking about ICE head's threats to imprison elected officials who support policies limiting cooperation with ICE [Read article here]

January 5: I'm quoted in article about San Antonio Police Department decision to prosecute alleged migrant smuggler under state law rather than hand over to ICE for federal prosecution [Read article here]

January 3: Quoted in article about ICE chief's threats to imprison elected officials who support migrant-friendly policies [Read article here]

2018

December 30: I'm quoted in The Atlantic discussing the special impact crimmigration policies have on black migrants [Read article here]

December 28: My crimmigration.com article about immigration prison population trends since 1990s makes Prison Policy Institute's "favorite criminal justice research of 2017" [Read PPI's list here]

December 22: Quoted in ThinkProgress article about legally dubious immigration detainer practices [Read article here]

December 20: Interviewed in Philadelphia NPR affiliate WHYY story about ICE arrests in area courthouses [Listen to story here]

December 12: My three-part white paper series on immigration detention published by Latino Community Foundation of Colorado [Read articles on adults, children and families, and vulnerable populations]

Learn more about César's media appearances here

Recent Posts

  • Legal limits on military deployment along US border
  • ICE transitioned from Obama to Trump with record high daily detention population
  • ICE detention population closed Obama era at record daily high
  • Immigration budget bill summary
  • Supreme Court to hear another immigration imprisonment case
  • Jennings v. Rodriguez highlights need for detention time limits

Search

Social Media

Blawg 100 Honoree

The information contained on these pages must not be considered legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This work by www.crImmigration.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.