Padilla v. Kentucky

9 Cir takes strong stance on right to effective assistance of counsel

In a well-reasoned and crisply written decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit bolstered the Sixth Amendment right to counsel for migrant defendants recently. In United States v. Rodriguez-Vega, No. 13-56415, slip op. (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2015), a three-judge panel held that a defendant who was provided less-than-clear advice about the immigration consequences of conviction was denied the effective assistance of counsel that the Sixth Amendment guarantees. This case involves a twenty-two year-old lawful permanent resident who was convicted of misdemeanor attempted [...]

Is Texas going to make it harder for migrants to receive effective assistance of counsel?

The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), holding that the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel obligates criminal defense attorneys to inform migrant clients about the immigration consequences of conviction continues to resonate in the state courts. Just last month the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued two decisions gutting Padilla’s applicability in that state (see my analysis of those decisions here). Now, it seems, Texas may be preparing to follow Wisconsin’s lead. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest criminal [...]

The “ordinary” case’s demise in criminal sentencing & its implications for immigration law

By Linus Chan When Congress passed the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) of 1984, federal courts needed to systematically decide what state convictions required sentencing enhancements designed to punish not only “habitual criminals” but “violent” offenders as well with higher sentences. Congress, however, didn’t define what makes for a violent offense and the lower courts were torn: did Congress mean for state law to govern or was a uniform, nationwide definition to apply? In 1990, the Supreme Court in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990), decided that a uniform definition was [...]

WI Supreme Court guts Padilla v. Kentucky

In two cases released the same day, the Wisconsin Supreme Court made it much more difficult for migrants to demand the effective assistance of counsel that the Sixth Amendment entitles them and all defendants in criminal prosecutions to receive. See Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010). In the process, the court revealed serious misunderstandings of constitutional law and a subtle but perceptible inclination toward rightwing legal claims credited by federal judge Andrew Hanen who presided over major attacks against President Obama’s immigration executive actions. Both decisions begin [...]

7 Cir: Migrant defendants entitled to roll the dice with a jury

Migrants facing criminal prosecution can turn down a plea offer and elect to go to trial no matter how good the plea deal, the U.S. Court of Appeals explained recently. DeBartolo v. United States, No. 14-3579, slip op. (7th Cir. June 26, 2015). Any ineffective assistance of counsel suffered along the way isn’t absolved simply because they turned down a perfectly good plea offer. This case involved an Italian citizen with a string of low-level drug convictions. His last eventually resulted in his deportation. Along the way, however, he was denied the competent legal counsel required by the [...]

Mellouli in the context of the modern deportation system

By Jason Cade On Wednesday, Jennifer Koh noted that Mellouli v. Lynch, 575 U.S. --- (2015), marks the fourth time in ten years that the federal government has zealously litigated the application of harsh removal provisions to lawfully present noncitizens with minor drug convictions all the way to the Supreme Court, only to lose. For my contribution to this online symposium, I’d like to put the Mellouli decision into an even broader context. My thoughts here draw on ideas that I am developing in a forthcoming article, entitled Enforcing Immigration Equity, to be published later this year in [...]

High Court Finds Government a Four-Time Loser

By Sejal Zota In Mellouli v. Lynch, No. 13-1034, slip op. (June 1, 2015), the Supreme Court returned a measure of sanity to the government’s deportation rules. For the fourth time in a decade the Supreme Court overwhelmingly rejected the government’s use of the nation's immigration laws to deport an individual with a minor drug conviction. Unfortunately, thousands of families were already separated from their spouses, children, parents, and siblings by the time our high court could intervene. Editor's Note: This essay is part of an online symposium about Mellouli on crImmigration.com [...]

Wash. Supreme Court: Padilla is retroactive; admonishment imposes on attorney duty to advise about immigration consequences

Continuing the inevitable development of right-to-counsel case law in the states courts, the Washington Supreme Court held last week that the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), applies no matter when the conviction was entered. In re Tsai, No. 88770-5, slip op. (Wash. May 7, 2005). A divided Washington Supreme Court—five justices in the majority, four in dissent—concluded that Padilla was not a new rule of constitutional law, thus it applies retroactively. This case involved two separate claims that were consolidated at the state supreme court [...]